Journal of Advances in Nanotechnology

Journal of Advances in Nanotechnology

Journal of Advances in Nanotechnology

Current Issue Volume No: 1 Issue No: 1

Research Article Open Access Available online freely Peer Reviewed Citation

Influence of Chemical Reaction on Marangoni Convective Flow of Nanoliquid in the Presence of Lorentz Forces and Thermal Radiation: A Numerical Investigation

1School of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, PR-China

2Department of Mathematics, Preston University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

3Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ardahan University, Ardahan, Turkey


This study aims to numerically investigate the Marangoni convective flow of nanoliquid initiated by surface tension and heading towards a radiative Riga surface. The surface tension appears in the problem due to the gradients of temperature and concentration at the interface. The influence of first order chemical reaction is involved in the system with sufficient boundary conditions. Set of governing nonlinear PDEs is transformed into highly nonlinear ODEs using suitable transformations. HAM is applied for convergent series solutions. Impact of various pertinent fluid parameters on momentum, thermal and solutal boundary layers is analyzed graphically. The chemical reaction plays vital role in saturation of nanoparticles in the base fluid near the surface as well as away from it. The Lorentz forces originated by the Riga surface become powerful when the radiation parameter comes into effect. The significance of Riga plate is thus more prominent through thermal radiation. However, the magnetic effect dampens down for higher radiation parameter. Fluid parameters, Nusslt and Sherwood numbers are analyzed with detailed discussion and concluding remarks.

Author Contributions
Received 10 Jan 2019; Accepted 01 Feb 2019; Published 08 Feb 2019;

Academic Editor: Inder Kaur, Nottingham Trent university, UK.

Checked for plagiarism: Yes

Review by: Single-blind

Copyright ©  2019 Ghulam Rasool, et al.

Creative Commons License     This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


Ghulam Rasool, Ting Zhang, Anum Shafiq, Hulya Durur (2019) Influence of Chemical Reaction on Marangoni Convective Flow of Nanoliquid in the Presence of Lorentz Forces and Thermal Radiation: A Numerical Investigation. Journal of Advances in Nanotechnology - 1(1):32-49.

Download as RIS, BibTeX, Text (Include abstract )

DOI 10.14302/issn.2689-2855.jan-19-2598


Carlo Marangoni, an Italian scientist introduced the concept of surface tension gradients driven fluid. This surface tension is popped up in the surface due to gradients of temperature and concentration on the occurrence of a liquid to liquid or liquid to air interface. A liquid with higher surface tension attracts more liquid from a region with low surface tension that ultimately results in fluid flow away from the regions having low surface tension. The gradients of temperature and concentration are therefore, critical factors for such convections under Marangoni effect. A significant interest developed in investigation of heat and mass convection under this phenomenon for its vast applications in industries such as welding, crystals, melting of electronic beams etc. Consequently, numerous researchers contributed in this field after Marangoni. Lin et al 1 worked on the convection under Marangoni phenomena with thermal gradients and magnetic number variation. Exact solutions achieved by Aly and Ebaid 2 in their study on Marangoni convection of nanoliquids achieved significant appreciation in nanoliquid convection analysis. Mat et al. 3, Gevorgyan et al. 4 and Al-sharafi et al. 5 have also contributed in this field of study with valuable results there in.

Engineers, Scientists working in the field of Nuclear energy, and Pharmaceutics come across the problem of rise in temperature in the working machine at a high speed performance. This situation was a big reason to worry in fluid mechanics before the introduction of Nanoliquids. The Idea of nanoliquid was introduced by Choi 6 in his research study. Pouring nanoparticles in a base fluid of poor conductivity showed drastically efficient results in the aspect of thermal conductivity of the base fluid. These impurities improved the conductivity of the fluid up to a significant level and the problem of machine heating was controlled with improved efficiency. Later on, Ibanez et al. 7 studied MHD nanoliquids analytically assuming convective boundary conditions. Hayat et al. 8 studied flow on stagnation point with an inclined magnetic field considering a nanofluid. Anum et al. 9 analyzed a third grade nanoliquid flow over a Riga plate with Cattaneo-Christov model in application. Hayat et al. 10 studied MHD-Powell-Eyring nanofluid flow with convective conditions. Alsabery et al. 11 studied heat flux in simulating the nanoliquid obtaining good results in Nusslt number. Numerous applications have been presented by Sheikholeslami and Ganji 12 in their research for useful nanoliquids. Nasrin et al. 13 studied free convection in aspect of nanoliquid passing through a chamber. Williamson nanoliquid has been analyzed by Bhatti and Rashidi 14. Parvin et al. 15 studied free convection through curved cavity using water based nanoliquid. Selimefendigil and Oztop 16 studied conjugate convection via titled cavity. Reddy et al. 17 performed numerical simulations of the mixed convection using two phase fluid model through a plate. For more related works one can see 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30.

Fluid flow analysis in the field of fluid mechanics has always been dependent on various external influencing agents. Researchers working in the field of Astrology and Geo physics always need such kind of external agents to ease the movement of fluid in their processing. Most of the fluids for example plasma are typically dependent on the magnetic induction for their flow phenomena. Reason of this dependence of fluids on external agents is poor conductivity of fluids. The problem was somehow reduced with the introduction of Riga plate, an array of permanently mounted magnets and alternating electrodes as displayed in the model of this paper. Gailitis and Lielausis 31 introduced this array in their study for the first time which is treated as a hallmark in the field of fluid mechanics. Later on, Ahmed et al. 32 studied the impacts of zero mass flux on fluids involving Riga plate in their model. Sheikholeslami et al. 33 in their research concluded that temperature profile shows decreasing behavior with strong Marangoni number (r) due to Lorentz forces. Shafiq et al. 34 studied fluid point-flow based Walters-B model involving a Riga plate in their study and found fruitful results in the aspect of thermal characteristics. Adeel et al. 35 analyzed mixed convection nanoliquids mounting a vertical Riga plate in the way of fluid flow with strong suction.

Numerous articles on nanoliquids are available in the literature in the context of heat and mass flux with different variables and different systematic approaches. However, the use of Riga plate for generation of magnetic effect together with effect of chemical reaction is not found in the literature as for as to the knowledge of the author that assures the novelty of this research work. In this study, firstly we have involved the Riga plate to generate Lorentz forces in the system. The chemical reaction effect and thermal radiation effect are considered. Secondly, the set of PDEs is converted into set of nonlinear ODEs with transformations using the technique of non-dimensionalization 36. The non-dimensionalized system is subjected to HAM 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 for convergent series solutions. Thirdly, the convergence of the results is analyzed graphically and finally, the results are plotted with sufficient discussion on the behavior of flow profiles.

Mathematical Model

A two dimensional steady and in-compressible nanoliquid is considered under Marangoni effect heading towards a radiative Riga surface. The flow is driven by tension appearing in the surface due to the temperature and concentration gradients. Thermal radiation and chemical reaction effects are utilized. The Brownian motion factor and Thermphoresis phenomena are of significant importance in this study. The temperature Tfrelates the temperature gradient whereas Cf relates the concentration gradient with base fluid. The heat-mass flux is considered along x-axis in Cartesian coordinates. Figure 1 displays the physical scenario for the aforementioned problem. The governing equations are therefore:

The surface tension s, being a function of T and C can be defined as follows:




with following boundary conditions,


Figure 1.Schematic Diagram
 Schematic Diagram

Here u, v represent the velocity components in x, y directions, respectively. μ is symbol of dynamic viscosity, v is the kinematic viscosity, ρf represents the density of fluid, K is used for chemical reaction, σ the surface tension, T0 and C0 are temperature and concentration on the surface, α is representing thermal diffusivity of the fluid, k is symbol of thermal conductivity of fluid. 𝜏 is used for ratio between heat capacity of the fluid, k is symbol of thermal conductivity of fluid. 𝜏 is used for ratio between heat capacity of the nanoparticles (PC)p and heat capacity of base fluid, (PC)f , DB is Brownian diffusion, DT is Thermophoresis, and qr is the typical radiative heat flux that can be written through Rosseland's approximation as follows:



where ∑* and K*are Stefan-Boltzmann's constant and coefficient of mean absorption, respectively. Using Taylor's series and omitting second and higher order terms, we get,


which upon substitution in (8) yields


Equation (10) in (3) gives,





We obtain,






where 𝜸 = (Co𝜸C) / (To𝜸T) is the ratio of thermal to solutal surface tension s.t. R=((C0-C)γC)/((T0-T)γT) and Ma|L,T=(L𝝙T𝜸T|C)/ να , Ma|L,C=(L𝝙CγC|T)/να are thermal and solutal Marangoni numbers resulting 𝜸=Ma\L,T / Ma\L,C is the Marangoni ratio. (Q=L4πj0 M0/8ν2xρ) is the modified Hartman number, (Pr = ν/α) is the Prandtl number, (Nb=(ρc)p DB C0 x2/ (ρc)f L2 a) is the Brownian motion factor, Sc=ν/D is the Schmidt number,(Nt= (ρc)p DT x2) / (ρc)f L2 a ) is Thermophoretic factor, (Rd= 4Σ* T3/ kk*), is radiation parameter and, (β=πL/a) is dimensionless parameter. Skin friction coefficient, local Nusselt and Sherwood numbers are defined by,



where Rex = ux/v represents the local Reynolds number.

Numerical Simulation

The efficiency of Homotopy analysis method (HAM) for solving non-linear ODEs has been witnessed through literature. Researchers have given preference to this technique over various other famous methods. The method starts with assumption of some suitable initial guess subject to the boundary conditions given in the problem. Let,



One can see that (16) is satisfied. Define,



such that,

Where ai are constants for. i = 1-7.The 0thorder deformation problems are:





 subject to,



Resulting the following system,

where p[0,1] is a typical embedding parameter and ĥf, ĥθ, ĥϕ are so-called auxiliary parameters with Nf, Nθ, Nϕ are the non-linear operators. For p=0,1, we have:


Using Taylor's expansion,


The convergence of (24) is purely dependent on the choice of ĥ. For p such that the system (24) converges, we write,

The mth order deformation problems are,

where ϕm=1for m>1 otherwise 0. Finally,





with following general solutions to the problem,




where ai are constants for i =1-7 and fm*(η), θm*(η),ϕm*(η)are special solutions.

Convergence of Solutions

The auxiliary parameters used for the flow profiles in series solutions in HAM are typically considered for controlling the convergence. These parameters significantly moderate the convergence rates thus are vital in achieving the convergence of final solutions. Convergence interval of f, θ and ϕ are sketched in Figure 2. One can see that the intervals of convergence for the aforementioned three profiles are (-0.40, 0.05), (-0.45, 0.05) and (-0.45, 0.05), respectively. The solutions show convergence after19th iteration for velocity profile and 26th iteration for temperature and concentration profiles, respectively.

Figure 2.H-Curves for Velocity, Temperature and Concentration Profiles
 H-Curves for Velocity, Temperature and Concentration Profiles

Results and Discussion

We examine the behavior of a surface tension driven nanofluid under the action of Lorentz forces generated by Riga surface and the chemical reaction inside the fluid. The flow is assumed in two dimensions such that x-axis is parallel to the fluid flow and y-axis is normal to the surface of the Riga plate. Influence of pertinent fluid parameters on flow profiles is plotted graphically and the discussion on these graphs is as follows. Figure 3 presents the behavior of velocity profile with variation in the dimensionless parameter β. The elevated values of β enhance the fluid viscosity that results in decreasing the flow momentum and corresponding boundary layer drops down. The flow velocity receives enhancement with elevated values of modified Hartman number as displayed in Figure 4. The graph of f(η) shows augmented variation with augmented values of. Q The induced Lorentz forces parallel to the flow profile enhance the surface tension produced in fluid that certainly drives the fluid with stronger force. Consequently the flow profile receives an increasing behavior. Figure 5 shows the behavior of velocity profile and associated boundary layer with variation in Marangoni ratio (r). One can see an increasing behavior in profile for elevated values of r. Figure 6 is the display of temperature profile against the dimensionless parameter β. The temperature drops down for elevated values of β. The rise in viscosity for elevated values of β results in slow motion of fluid and consequently lessens the collisions in between fluid particles as well as between fluid particles and nanoparticles that results in decreasing behavior of temperature profile. The same is noticed with augmented values of Q plotted in Figure 7. The temperature profile and associated boundary layer shows a decreasing behavior. A significantly prominent increase in temperature profile is witnessed for larger values of Prandtl number (Pr) portrayed in Figure 8. Since, Prandtl number is the ratio of momentum diffusivity to thermal diffiusivity, therefore, the elevated values of P𝜸 number enhance the momentum diffusivisity that results in enhancement of temperature profile and associated boundary layer. Not prominent, but comparatively an increasing behavior is noticed in temperature profile with enhancement in Thermophoretic factor (Nt) as plotted in Figure 9. The enhancement is dependent on the strong Thermophoretic force that results the away

Figure 3.Velocity profile against ß
 Velocity profile against ß

Figure 4.Velocity profile against Q
 Velocity profile against Q

Figure 5.Velocity Profile against r
 Velocity Profile against r

Figure 6.Temperature profile against ß
 Temperature profile against ß

Figure 7.Temperature profile against Q
 Temperature profile against Q

Figure 8.Temperature profile against Pr
 Temperature profile against Pr

Figure 9.Temperature profile against Nt
 Temperature profile against Nt

movement of nanoparticles from the surface of Riga. Figure 10 is the display of influence of radiation factor (Rd) on the temperature profile. Temperature profile receives prominent enhancement in its behavior with elevated values of radiation factor. Thus the addition of radiation factor enhances the heat flux up to a significant level. Figure 11 is plotted to analyze the behavior of concentration of nanoparticles against the variation in Brownian motion factor (Nb). The stronger Brownian motion factor enhances the in-predictive motion of fluid particles that results in enhancement of temperature distribution. This enhancement in temperature drops down the concentration of nanoparticles near the Riga surface. The concentration profile enhances with elevated values of Schmidt number (Sc) for certain reasons as shown in Figure 12. The main reason is the enhancement in Brownian diffusivity that results in enhancement of associated boundary layer of concentration of nanoparticles in the base fluid. Elevated values of both the chemical reaction and radiation factor result in decreasing behavior of the concentration profile displayed in Figure 13 and Figure 14, respectively. The enhancement in chemical reaction results in away movement of nanoparticles from the surface that ultimately effects the concentration in the base fluid. The elevated values of Thermophoretic factor (Nt) result in enhancement of heat flux but drops down the mass flux while the enhancement in Prandtl results in decreasing behavior of the Sherwood number (the mass flux) as plotted in Figure 15, Figure 16 and Figure 17.

Figure 10.Temperature profile against Rd
 Temperature profile against Rd

Figure 11.Concentration profile against Nb
 Concentration profile against Nb

Figure 12.Concentration profile against Sc
 Concentration profile against Sc

Figure 13.Concentration profile against K
 Concentration profile against K

Figure 14.Concentration profile against Rd
 Concentration profile against Rd

Figure 15.Nusslt number against Nb
 Nusslt number against Nb

Figure 16.Sherwood number against Nb
 Sherwood number against Nb

Figure 17.Sherwood number against Nb
 Sherwood number against Nb


This subsection summarizes the result with a precise comparison of present results with 33. Setting M=0 in 33 and Q=0=K=Rd in present model, the left over system of equations and the graphical results are exactly the same in either case as presented in Figure 18 for the velocity profile against Marangoni ratio (r). However, considering the effects of Q, K and Rd, we observe that there is a significant variation in the graphical results in the present work as compared to the previous work. For example, the elevated values of 𝜸 result in a rapid increasing behavior of velocity profile in the present case as compared to 33 confirming a more prominent effect of Marangoni ratio (r) on the flow profiles.

Figure 18.Comparison with 33
 Comparison with 33

Closing Remarks

We examine the behavior of a surface tension driven nanofluid under the action of Lorentz forces generated by Riga surface and the chemical reaction inside the fluid. The flow is assumed in two dimensions such that x-axis is parallel to the fluid flow and y-axis is normal to the surface of the Riga plate. The final governing equations after application of suitable transformations with sufficient boundary conditions have been solved by HAM. The convergent series solutions are presented and analyzed graphically. Following are salient conclusions

Velocity profiles receives prominent enhancement with stronger Marangoni factor (r) however, the elevated values of dimensionless parameter β result in decreasing behavior of flow velocity and the associated boundary layer drops down.

Prandtl number is an enhancing factor for the temperature distribution.

Both the radiation and thermophoresis are increasing factors of temperature distribution.

Chemical reaction forces the away movement of nanoparticles from Riga surface. A prominent decreasing behavior is witnessed with elevated values of K.

Heat flux enhances with augmented values of Thermophoretic factor (Nt).

Mass flux declines with augmented values of Thermophoretic factor (Nt) and the Prandtl factor (Pr).


  1. 1.Lin Y, Zheng L, Zhang X. (2015) MHD Marangoni boundary layer flow and heat transfer of pseudo-plastic nanofluids over a porous medium with a modified model, Mech Time-Depend Mater. 4(19), 519-36.
  1. 2.E H Aly, Ebaid A. (2016) Exact analysis for the effect of heat transfer on MHD and radiation Marangoni boundary layer nanofluid flow past a surface embedded in a porous medium. , J Mol Liquids 215, 625-39.
  1. 3.Mat N A A, N M Arifin, Nazar R. (2012) Radiation effect on Marangoni convection boundary layer flow of a nanofluid. Mathemat Sci. 1(6), 1-6.
  1. 4.G S, K A Petrosyan, R S Hakobyan, R B Alaverdyan. (2017) . , Experimental Investigation of Marangoni Convection in Nanofluids, Journal of Contemporary Physics (Armenian Academy of Sciences) 4(52), 362-365.
  1. 5.Al-Sharafi Abdullah, Z Sahin Ahmet, S Yilbas Bekir, S Z. (2016) Marangoni convection flow and heat transfer characteristics of water–CNT nanofluid droplets, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications. 7(69), 763-780.
  1. 6.Choi S. (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles, Developments and Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows. , New York 66, 99-105.
  1. 7.Ibáñez G, LÃpez A, Pantoja J, Moreira J. (2016) Entropy generation analysis of a nanofluid flow in MHD porous microchannel with hydrodynamic slip and thermal radiation. , Int J Heat Mass Trans 89-97.
  1. 8.Hayat T, Qayyum S, Alsaedi A, Shafiq A. (2016) Inclined magnetic field and heat source/sink aspects in flow of nanofluid with nonlinear thermal radiation. , Int J Heat Mass Trans 103, 99-107.
  1. 9.Naseem A, Shafiq A, Zhao L, M U Farooq. (2018) Analytical investigation of third grade nanofluidic flow over a riga plate using Cattaneo-Christov model, Results in Physics. 9, 961-969.
  1. 10.Hayat T, Hussain S, Muhammad T, Alsaedi A, Ayub M. (2017) Radiative flow of Powell–Eyring nanofluid with convective boundary conditions. , Chinese Journal of Physics 55, 1523-1538.
  1. 11.A I, A J Chamkha, Saleh H, Hashim I. (2016) Heatline visualization of conjugate natural convection in a square cavity filled with nanofluid with sinusoidal temperature variations on both horizontal walls. , Int. J. Heat Mass Transf 100, 835-850.
  1. 12.Sheikholeslami M, D. (2014) Heated Permeable Stretching Surface in a Porous Medium Using Nanofluids. , Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 7, 535-542.
  1. 13.Nasrin R, M A Alim, A J Chamkha. (2012) Prandtl number and aspect ratio. , Int. J. Heat Mass Transf 55, 7355-7365.
  1. 14.Bhatti M M, Rashidi M M. (2016) Effects of thermo-diffusion and thermal radiation on Williamson nanofluid over a porous shrinking/stretching sheet. , J. Mol. Liq 221, 567-573.
  1. 15.Parvin S, Nasrin R, M A Alim, N F Hossain, A J Chamkha. (2012) Thermal Conductivity Variation on Natural Convection Flow of Water-Alumina Nanofluid in an Annulus. , Int. J. Heat 55, 5268-5274.
  1. 16.Selimefendigil F, H F Öztop. (2016) Conjugate natural convection in a cavity with a conductive partition and filled with different nanofluids on different sides of the partition. , J. Mol. Liq 216, 67-77.
  1. 17.RamReddy C, Murthy P V S N, A J Chamkha, A M Rashad. (2013) Soret-driven thermosolutal convection induced by inclined thermal and solutal gradients in a shallow horizontal layer of a porous medium. , Int. J. Heat 64, 384-392.
  1. 18.Sheikholeslami M, Vajravelu K, M. (2016) Forced convection heat transfer in a semi annulus under the influence of a variable magnetic field. , Int. J. Heat Mass Transf 92, 339-348.
  1. 19.Sheikholeslami M, Abelman S. (2015) Two phase simulation of nanofluid flow and heat transfer in an annulus in the presence of an axial magnetic field. , IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol 14, 561-569.
  1. 20.Sheikholeslami M, Kandelousi. (2014) Influence of Lorentz forces on nanofluid forced convection considering Marangoni convection. Author links open overlay panel. , Phys. Lett. A 378, 3331-3339.
  1. 21.Bhatti M M, Abbas T, Rashidi M M, El-Sayed A M.Numerical simulation of entropy generation with thermal radiation on MHD Carreau nanofluid towards a shrinking sheet. , Entropy 216, 18-200.
  1. 22.M, Abbas T, M, A M El-Sayed, Yang Z. (2016) Generation on MHD Eyring-Powell nanofluid through a permeable stretching surface, Entropy. 18, 224.
  1. 23.Sheikholeslami M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. (2016) Effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions in flow of nanofluids over a nonlinear stretching surface with variable surface thickness. , Int. J. Heat Mass Transf 09-077.
  1. 24.Sheikholeslami M, Ganji D D. (2016) Influence of Lorentz forces on nanofluid forced convection considering Marangoni convection. , J. Mol. Liq 224, 526-537.
  1. 25.Sheikholeslami M. (2015) Effect of uniform suction on nanofluid flow and heat transfer over a cylinder. , J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng 37, 1623-1633.
  1. 26.A J Chamkha, Abbasbandy S, A M Rashad, Vajravelu K. (2012) Radiation effects on mixed convection over a wedge embedded in a porous medium filled with a nanofluid, Transp. Porous Media. 91, 261-279.
  1. 27.Chamkha A J M. (2015) Flow and convective heat transfer of a ferro-nanofluid in a double-sided lid-driven cavity with a wavy wall in the presence of a variable magnetic field, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A. 69, 1186-1200.
  1. 28.Sheikholeslami M, A J Chamkha. (2016) Unsteady ferromagnetic liquid flow and heat transfer analysis over a stretching sheet with the effect of dipole and prescribed heat flux., Heat Transfer, Part A. 69, 781-793.
  1. 29.Sheikholeslami M, H R Ashorynejad, Rana P. (2016) Simultaneous effects of nanoparticles and slip on Jeffrey fluid through tapered artery with mild stenosis. , J. Mol. Liq 214, 86-95.
  1. 30.Sheikholeslami M. (2016) Flow and convective heat transfer of a ferro-nanofluid in a double-sided lid-driven cavity with a wavy wall in the presence of a variable magnetic field. , Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 09-185.
  1. 31.Gailitis A, Lielausis O. (1961) On a possibility to reduce the hydrodynamic resistance of a plate in an electrolyte, Appl Mag Rep Phys Inst. 12, 143-6.
  1. 32.Ahmad R, Mustafa M, Turkyilmazoglu M. (2017) Buoyancy effects on nanofluid flow past a convectively heated vertical Riga-plate: A numerical study. , Int J Heat and Mass Trans 111, 827-35.
  1. 33.Sheikholeslami M, A J Chamkha. (2017) Influence of Lorentz forces on nanofluid forced convection considering Marangoni convection. , Journal of Molecular Liquids 225, 750-757.
  1. 34.Shafiq A, Hammouch Z, Turab A. (2018) Impact of radiation in a stagnation point flow of Walters’ B fluid towards a Riga plate, Thermal Science and Engineering Progress. 6, 27-33.
  1. 35.Adeel A, Saleem A, Sumaira A. (2016) Flow of nanofluid past a Riga plate. , Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 402, 44-48.
  1. 36.Ali I, Rasool G, Alrashed S. (2018) Numerical simulations of reaction–diffusion equations modeling prey–predator interaction with delay. , International Journal of Biomathematics 11(4), 1850054.
  1. 37.Shijun L. (1998) Homotopy analysis method: A new analytic method for nonlinear problems. , Appl Math Mech 19, 957.
  1. 38.Shafiq A, Nawaz M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. (2013) Magnetohydrodynamic axisymmetric flow of a third-grade fluid between two porous disks. , Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering (USA) 3, 599-609.
  1. 39.Shafiq A, Jabeen S, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. (2017) Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model for squeezed flow of third grade fluid, Surface Review and letters. 24, 1-11.
  1. 40.Shafiq A, Hammouch Z, T N Sindhu. (2017) Bioconvective MHD flow of Tangent hyperbolic nano-fluid with Newtonian heating. , International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.133: 759-766.
  1. 41.Shafiq A, T N Sindhu. (2017) Statistical study of hydromagnetic boundary layer flow of Williamson fluid regarding a radiative surface, Result in Physics. 7, 3059-3067.
  1. 42.Malik R, Khan M, Shafiq A, Mushtaq M, Hussain M. (2017) An analysis of Cattaneo-Christov double-diffusion model for Sisko fluid flow with velocity slip. , Journal of Molecular Liquid 7, 1232-1237.

Cited by (38)

  1. 1.Rashed A. S., Mabrouk S. M., Wazwaz Abdul-Majid, 2023, Unsteady three-dimensional laminar flow over a submerged plate in electrically conducting fluid with applied magnetic field, Waves in Random and Complex Media, 33(3), 505, 10.1080/17455030.2021.1883147
  1. 2.Rasool Ghulam, Zhang Ting, Xin Baogui, 2019, Darcy-Forchheimer nanofluidic flow manifested with Cattaneo-Christov theory of heat and mass flux over non-linearly stretching surface, PLOS ONE, 14(8), e0221302, 10.1371/journal.pone.0221302
  1. 3.Ahmed Arsalan, Poonam K. K., Khalil Munam, Ali Arshad, 2021, Numerical Scruitinization of Unsteady 3D Flow of Jeffrey Nanofluid with MHD in a Porous Medium, International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, 7(3), 10.1007/s40819-021-01031-4
  1. 4.Shafiq Anum, Khan Ilyas, Rasool Ghulam, Seikh Asiful, Sherif El-Sayed, 2019, Significance of Double Stratification in Stagnation Point Flow of Third-Grade Fluid towards a Radiative Stretching Cylinder, Mathematics, 7(11), 1103, 10.3390/math7111103
  1. 5.Rasool Ghulam, Zhang Ting, Chamkha Ali J., Shafiq Anum, Tlili Iskander, et al, 2019, Entropy Generation and Consequences of Binary Chemical Reaction on MHD Darcy–Forchheimer Williamson Nanofluid Flow Over Non-Linearly Stretching Surface, Entropy, 22(1), 18, 10.3390/e22010018
  1. 6.Abdelhafez M. A., Awad Amal A., Nafe Mohamed A., Eisa Dalia A., 2021, Time-dependent viscous flow of higher-order reactive MHD Maxwell nanofluid with Joule heating in a porous regime, Waves in Random and Complex Media, (), 1, 10.1080/17455030.2021.1927237
  1. 7.Ansari Md Sharifuddin, Magagula Vusi Mpendulo, Trivedi Mumukshu, 2020, Jeffrey nanofluid flow near a Riga plate: Spectral quasilinearization approach, Heat Transfer, 49(3), 1491, 10.1002/htj.21673
  1. 8.Shafiq Anum, Zari Islam, Rasool Ghulam, Tlili Iskander, Khan Tahir Saeed, 2019, On the MHD Casson Axisymmetric Marangoni Forced Convective Flow of Nanofluids, Mathematics, 7(11), 1087, 10.3390/math7111087
  1. 9.Oyelakin Ibukun Sarah, Sibanda P., 2020, Homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions in flow past a horizontal circular cylinder with an induced magnetic field and nonlinear thermal radiation, Heat Transfer, 49(2), 1065, 10.1002/htj.21653
  1. 10.Rasool Ghulam, Zhang Ting, Shafiq Anum, 2019, Second grade nanofluidic flow past a convectively heated vertical Riga plate, Physica Scripta, 94(12), 125212, 10.1088/1402-4896/ab3990
  1. 11.Ilyas Hira, Ahmad Iftikhar, Raja Muhammad Asif Zahoor, Shoaib Muhammad, 2021, A novel design of Gaussian WaveNets for rotational hybrid nanofluidic flow over a stretching sheet involving thermal radiation, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 123(), 105196, 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105196
  1. 12.Shafiq Anum, Rasool Ghulam, Khalique Chaudry Masood, 2020, Significance of Thermal Slip and Convective Boundary Conditions in Three Dimensional Rotating Darcy-Forchheimer Nanofluid Flow, Symmetry, 12(5), 741, 10.3390/sym12050741
  1. 13.Shafiq Anum, Khan Ilyas, Rasool Ghulam, Sherif El-Sayed M., Sheikh Asiful H., 2020, Influence of Single- and Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes on Magnetohydrodynamic Stagnation Point Nanofluid Flow over Variable Thicker Surface with Concave and Convex Effects, Mathematics, 8(1), 104, 10.3390/math8010104
  1. 14.Abbas Munawar, Khan Nargis, Hashmi M. S., Younis Jihad, 2023, Numerically analysis of Marangoni convective flow of hybrid nanofluid over an infinite disk with thermophoresis particle deposition, Scientific Reports, 13(1), 10.1038/s41598-023-32011-x
  1. 15.Sarkar Amit, Kundu Prabir Kumar, 2020, Passive control nanoparticles in double‐diffusive free convection nanofluid flow over an inclined permeable plate, Heat Transfer—Asian Research, 49(1), 289, 10.1002/htj.21613
  1. 16.Raees Ammarah, Saeed Sidra, Hussain Muzamil, Farooq Umer, Chamkha Ali J., 2022, Nonsimilar modeling and numerical convective transport analysis of forced flow of radiative Carreau nanofluid with zero mass flux boundary condition, ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 102(11), 10.1002/zamm.202100506
  1. 17.Ibrahim Wubshet, Gizewu Tezera, 2020, Nonlinear mixed convection flow of a tangent hyperbolic fluid with activation energy, Heat Transfer, 49(5), 2427, 10.1002/htj.21729
  1. 18.Shafiq Anum, Sindhu Tabassum Naz, Khalique Chaudry Masood, 2020, Numerical investigation and sensitivity analysis on bioconvective tangent hyperbolic nanofluid flow towards stretching surface by response surface methodology, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(6), 4533, 10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.007
  1. 19.Krishna Shwetank, Ridha Syahrir, Vasant Pandian, Ilyas Suhaib Umer, Irawan Sonny, et al, 2020, Explicit flow velocity modelling of yield power-law fluid in concentric annulus to predict surge and swab pressure gradient for petroleum drilling applications, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 195(), 107743, 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107743
  1. 20.Lund Liaquat Ali, Omar Zurni, Khan Ilyas, Raza Jawad, Sherif El-Sayed M., et al, 2020, Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Flow of Micropolar Fluid with Effects of Viscous Dissipation and Joule Heating Over an Exponential Shrinking Sheet: Triple Solutions and Stability Analysis, Symmetry, 12(1), 142, 10.3390/sym12010142
  1. 21.Saleem Musharafa, Tufail Muhammad Nazim, Chaudhry Qasim Ali, 2022, Significance of the physical quantities for the non-Newtonian fluid flow in an irregular channel with heat and mass transfer effects: Lie group analysis, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(3), 1968, 10.1016/j.aej.2021.07.003
  1. 22.Rasool Ghulam, Shafiq Anum, Tlili Iskander, 2020, Marangoni convective nanofluid flow over an electromagnetic actuator in the presence of first‐order chemical reaction, Heat Transfer—Asian Research, 49(1), 274, 10.1002/htj.21612
  1. 23.Shafiq Anum, Khalique Chaudry Masood, 2020, Lie group analysis of upper convected Maxwell fluid flow along stretching surface, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(4), 2533, 10.1016/j.aej.2020.04.017
  1. 24.Jahnavi K. R., Hegde Ganesh Shridhar, 2024, A Review on Nano Fluid Production, Mathematical Modelling and Applications, Journal of Nanofluids, 13(2), 269, 10.1166/jon.2024.2138
  1. 25.Rasool Ghulam, Zhang Ting, 2019, Characteristics of chemical reaction and convective boundary conditions in Powell-Eyring nanofluid flow along a radiative Riga plate, Heliyon, 5(4), e01479, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01479
  1. 26.Riaz Muhammad, Khan Nargis, Hashmi M. S., Younis Jihad, 2023, Heat and mass transfer analysis for magnetized flow of $${\mathrm{ZnO}-SAE50}$$ nanolubricant with variable properties: an application of Cattaneo–Christov model, Scientific Reports, 13(1), 10.1038/s41598-023-35988-7
  1. 27.Zahoor Raja M. Asif, Shoaib M., El-Zahar Essam Roshdy, Hussain Saddiqa, Li Yong-Min, et al, 2022, Heat transport in entropy-optimized flow of viscoelastic fluid due to Riga plate: analysis of artificial neural network, Waves in Random and Complex Media, (), 1, 10.1080/17455030.2022.2028933
  1. 28.Hakamy A., 2020, Effect of CaCO3 nanoparticles on the microstructure and fracture toughness of ceramic nanocomposites, Journal of Taibah University for Science, 14(1), 1201, 10.1080/16583655.2020.1809840
  1. 29.Ullah Zia, Abbas Amir, El-Zahar Essam R., Seddek Laila F., Akgul Ali, et al, 2023, Significance of thermal density and viscous dissipation on heat and mass transfer of chemically reactive nanofluid flow along stretching sheet under magnetic field, Results in Engineering, 20(), 101413, 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101413
  1. 30.KESEMEN Tülay, MERDAN Mehmet, BEKİRYAZICI Zafer, 2020, Analysis of The Dynamics of The Classical Epidemic Model with Beta Distributed Random Components, Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(3), 1956, 10.21597/jist.658471
  1. 31.Eid Mohamed R., 2020, Thermal Characteristics of 3D Nanofluid Flow over a Convectively Heated Riga Surface in a Darcy–Forchheimer Porous Material with Linear Thermal Radiation: An Optimal Analysis, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(11), 9803, 10.1007/s13369-020-04943-3
  1. 32.Anuar Nur Syazana, Bachok Norfifah, Pop Ioan, 2021, Radiative hybrid nanofluid flow past a rotating permeable stretching/shrinking sheet, International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 31(3), 914, 10.1108/HFF-03-2020-0149
  1. 33.Awan Aziz Ullah, Riaz Samia, Sattar Samina, Abro Kashif Ali, 2020, Fractional modeling and synchronization of ferrofluid on free convection flow with magnetolysis, The European Physical Journal Plus, 135(10), 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00852-4
  1. 34.Rasool Ghulam, Shafiq Anum, Durur Hülya, 2021, Darcy-Forchheimer relation in Magnetohydrodynamic Jeffrey nanofluid flow over stretching surface, Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 14(7), 2497, 10.3934/dcdss.2020399
  1. 35.Rasool Ghulam, Shafiq Anum, Khalique Chaudry Masood, Zhang Ting, 2019, Magnetohydrodynamic Darcy–Forchheimer nanofluid flow over a nonlinear stretching sheet, Physica Scripta, 94(10), 105221, 10.1088/1402-4896/ab18c8
  1. 36.Rooman Muhammad, Jan Muhammad Asif, Shah Zahir, Kumam Poom, Alshehri Ahmed, 2021, Entropy optimization and heat transfer analysis in MHD Williamson nanofluid flow over a vertical Riga plate with nonlinear thermal radiation, Scientific Reports, 11(1), 10.1038/s41598-021-97874-4
  1. 37.Sohail Muhammad, Alrabaiah Hussam, Nazir Umar, 2021, Radiative flow of MHD non‐Newtonian fluid by utilizing the updated version of heat flux model under Joule heating, Heat Transfer, 50(4), 3407, 10.1002/htj.22034
  1. 38.Ibrahim Wubshet, Zemedu Chaluma, 2020, Numerical solution of micropolar nanofluids with Soret, Dufor effects and multiple slip conditions, Journal of Physics Communications, 4(1), 015016, 10.1088/2399-6528/ab5260