Journal of Parasite Research

Journal of Parasite Research

Journal of Parasite Research

Current Issue Volume No: 1 Issue No: 3

Research Article Open Access Available online freely Peer Reviewed Citation Provisional

Evaluation of Anthelmintic Activities of Fractions of Acanthus Montanus (Acanthaceae) on Adult Heligmosomoides Bakeri (Nematoda, Heligmosomatidae)

1Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.

2Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

3National Animal Production Research Institute, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

4Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

5Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria.

6Africa Centre of Excellence in Phytomedicine Research and Development (ACEPRD) University of Jos, Jos Nigeria.


Acanthus montanusNees T. Anderson (Acanthaceae) has been employed in folk medicine for treatment of different kinds of ailment, but there is dearth of documented information on its therapeutic activities against parasites. In this study, pulverized Acanthus montanusleaf was subjected to four different extraction techniques. The percentage of yields were 25.58%, 31.42%, 11.58% and 3.00% weight by weight (w/w) of crude ethanol extract (CEE), aqueous (AQ), n-butanol (BUT) and chloroform (CHLO) portions, respectively. All the extracts, excluding the chloroform portion were administered to worm-infested mice per os at dose of 1.2 g/kg, 1.4 g/kg, 1.7 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg each for five days consecutive. Mice were euthanized and the adult worm counted for rates of deparasitization. The aqueous extract did not cause significant deparasitization even at the highest dose of 2.0 g/kg. The CEE caused significant (p<0.05) deparasitization rate of 72.35% at 2.0 g/kg dose. The n-butanol portion caused significant (p<0.05) deparasitization rates at doses between 1.4 mg/kg and 2.0 mg/kg (86.17% and 97.04% respectively) compared to figures from distilled water-treated mice (Control) as well as those from mice treated with the aqueous or crude ethanol portion. The 97.04% deparasitization produced by the 2.0 g/kg dose was not stastistically different (p>0.05) from the 100% deparasitization obtained using albendazole at the manufacturer’s recommended dose of 10 mg/kg. This study has demonstrated that the n-butanol extract of Acanthus montanus leaf has profound anthelmintic activity against experimental Heligmosomoidesbakeri infection in mice. Further phytochemical analysis and evaluation is being advocated in large animals and possibly human subjects.


Author Contributions
Received 15 May 2021; Accepted 29 Jun 2021; Published 13 Jul 2021;

Academic Editor: Andreia Manuela Garcês, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Checked for plagiarism: Yes

Review by: Single-blind

Copyright ©  2021 David O. Oshadu, et al.

Creative Commons License     This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


David O. Oshadu, Joseph O. Ajanusi, Patricia N. Chiezey, Mohammed S. Abubakar, Maryam N. Patrobas et al. (2021) Evaluation of Anthelmintic Activities of Fractions of Acanthus Montanus (Acanthaceae) on Adult Heligmosomoides Bakeri (Nematoda, Heligmosomatidae) . Journal of Parasite Research - 1(3):1-10.

Download as RIS, BibTeX, Text (Include abstract )

DOI 10.14302/issn.2690-6759.jpar-21-3844


Helminths are a major cause of reduced productivity in livestock in many countries, particularly the tropics 1. Among the three main classes of helminths (Cestoda, Trematoda and Nematoda) that exist, the Class Nematoda contains the most pathogenic helminths of livestock and companion animals, hence a threat to successful and sustainable livestock production worldwide 2. These helminth infections cause direct and indirect losses. Direct losses are due to drop in production and death of animals, while indirect losses are due to cost incurred on control strategies such as cost of drugs, labour and drenching equipment. Other helminth-related setbacks include delay in achieving target weights, reduced quality of carcass and predisposition to other diseases 3.

Heligmosomoidesbakeri, a parasite of laboratory mouse, Mus musculus4 of the Subfamily Heligmosominae, closely related to species of economic importance contained in the Subfamily Trichostrongylinae 5 is the ideal model for experimental works. This nematode is widely used as a gastrointestinal parasitic model in immunological, pharmacological, and toxicological studies 6. Many anthelmintic studies have been carried out using H. bakeri7, 8, 9. It is a convenient parasite to conduct experimental work because of its short and direct life cycle 10.

Systemic anthelmintics have long been considered the most effective way of controlling helminth infections, to minimize losses. However, the threats of anthelmintic resistance and risk of residue in meat and milk are of concern. The availability and affordability of systemic anthelmintics to small holder farmers and pastoralists is a major problem in many developing countries. These setbacks justify the need for the use of traditional medicine plants 11 in different parts of the world. The screening and proper evaluation of medicinal plants could offer possible alternatives that may both be sustainable and environmentally acceptable 12.

Acanthus montanus (Nees) T. Anderson, a member of the Acanthaceae family 13 have been used to treat various ailments in Africa. This prickly perennial shrub variously known as “Bear’s breech”, “Mountain thistle”, “Alligator plant” and “Thorny pigweed” 13, 14 has been employed in folk medicine by the Igede people of Benue State, Nigeria for treatment of different kinds of ailments 15, and positive results seem to be associated with the folkloric use of the leaves of this plant, Idumngbe, as called by the Etulo natives in Benue State, Nigeria, in the treatment and control of gastrointestinal worms in children and adults 16. 17 reported that A. montanus might have anthelmintic property. Although some studies 16, 17 have been conducted on the anthelmintic properties of A. montanusleaf extract, no study has established the anthelmintic properties of different fractions of this plant on H. bakeri. In the present study, in vivo studywas performed to evaluate the anthelmintic properties of aqueous, crude ethanol and n-butanol extracts of the leaves of A. montanuson the adult H. bakeri, the trichostrongyloid model of the laboratory mouse 4, with the view to determining the minimum concentration that has significant anthelmintic activity.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material Collection and Identification

Fresh leaves of A. montanuswith stalks were collected/ harvested in the months of March and April along a stream in northern part of Katsina-Ala township of Katsina-Ala Local Government Area of Benue State. Katsina-Ala town is located on latitude 7º 10ʹ N and longitude 9º 19ʹ E in the middle belt (Guinea Savannah) of Nigeria. A sample of the plant was brought to Zaria and was identified/ authenticated by a plant taxonomist at the Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, where a voucher specimen was deposited and assigned a voucher number 7037.

Preparation and Preservation of Extracts

The harvested leaves were air-dried at room temperature until a constant weight was obtained, then pounded in a wooden mortar with pestle. The pulverized product weighing about 6 kg was stored in an air-tight nylon bag under cool, dark conditions at room temperature until use.

During extraction, 1 kg (250 g per separating funnel) of the pulverized product was soaked in 95% ethanol (EtOH) in the ratio 1:6 w/v in four separating funnels (pre-plugged with cotton wool) for 72 hours. The extracted solution collected in excess of the solvent was transferred in evaporating dishes and concentrated to dryness over water baths at 60ºC. The dried extract obtained after concentration was then weighed to determine the percentage yield. Thereafter, 100 g of the mixture was suspended in 300 mL of 17.65% methanol (MeOH) in a large beaker. The solution was then partitioned with chloroform in equal volume in a separating funnel to yield chloroform (CHLO) and aqueous (AQ) portions. Lastly, the aqueous portion was further partitioned with n-butanol in equal volume also, to obtain final n-butanol (BuOH/BUT) and aqueous extracts. In each partitioning step, the mixtures were vigorously shaken to re-suspend the particles. Impurities were pooled together in a separate beaker and discarded. The different portions collected in separate conical flasks were again concentrated to residue over the water bath at 60ºC and weighed to determine percentage yield in terms of the mass of the crude ethanol extract (CEE). These different fractions of leaf extracts of A. montanuswere packed in clean air-tight glass bottles and stored at room temperature in the laboratory hood until used.

Qualitative Phytochemical Screening of Crude Ethanolic Leaf Extracts of A. Montanus

One gramme of crude ethanol leaf extracts of A. montanuswas dissolved in 100 mL of distilled water in three test tubes and subjected to qualitative phytochemical screening employing standard screening tests 18.

Thin Layer Chromatography

Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) was carried out on the crude ethanol leaf extracts of A. montanusand the different fractions thereof using the method of Mehta 19. Little quantities of the Crude Ethanol, n-Butanol, Chloroform and Aqueous Extract of A. montanusleaf were fetched with a spatula and dissolved in 5 mL in their respective solvents in well labeled Bijou bottles. These were used to spot 10 cm x 5 cm TLC plates (already coated with 0.25 mm silica gel 60F254 that were marked at about 1.0 cm intervals and 1.5 cm from the bottom) using capillary tubes and were allowed to air dry. The plates were then placed (the spotted portion downwards) in an air-tight TLC tank that was already charged with eluting solvent (chloroform-ethyl acetate-formic acid, 5:4:1). The respective plant constituent(s) were allowed to drag upward along the stationary phase from the spots by capillary action until the solvent front was seen reaching the top. The plates were then removed, marked, air-dried and sprayed with the detecting (spray) reagents (1% FeCl3, Dragendoff’s and Anisaldehyde-H2SO4 in 10% ethanol) 20 in the fume hood to develop the chromograms. Retention factor (Rf) value of the compound(s) was calculated by dividing the distance travelled by the compound (solute) by that travelled by the solvent front 18, 19.

Experimental Animals Used in Anthelmintic Studies

Ninety (5-10 weeks) apparently healthy albino mice, Mus musculus of both sexes weighing between 15 and 25 g were obtained and were housed in well fenestrated plastic cages and allowed free access to standard feed and tap water. Within the two weeks of acclimatization, faecal pellets obtained per rectum from the group set aside for anthelmintic studies were analysed and the mice treated with broad spectrum anthelmintic, albendazole at 10 mg/kg for deparasitization.

The Parasite Heligmosomoides Bakeri

Heligmosomoidesbakeriadult were obtained from Helminthology Laboratory of the Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka-Nigeria where they were maintained in mice. Both infected mice and infective (L3) larvae were transported to Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. They were immediately multiplied and maintained under laboratory conditions.

Faecal Sample Collection, Coproculture and Recovery of Infective L3 of H. Bakeri

The modified method of 21 was used to obtain clean infective larvae used for anthelmintic trial. The larval suspension was allowed to stand on the bench for one hour. The supernatant fluid was carefully aspirated using Pasteur pipette. To ensure an even distribution of the larvae, the suspension was mixed by gentle shaking of the tube. Thereafter, an aliquot of 0.1 mL was drawn onto a clean microscope slide and larvae counted under x4 objective. This was repeated four more times, after which mean count obtained was used to determine the number of larvae/mL of the suspension.

Experimental Infection of Mice with H. Bakeri L3

Experimental infection of mice was by oral route (gavage). Mice were well restrained at the scruff and 0.1 mL of the larval suspension inoculated right into the oesophagus via a blunted tip slightly curved 18 gauge needle mounted on tuberculin (1 mL) syringe. One hundred and fifty (150) infective larvae (L3) of H. bakeriwere inoculated into each worm-free mouse.

Treatment Groups

Seventy (70) mice positive for ova of H. bakeriat 15th day post infection (PI) were randomly assigned into 14 experimental (treatment) groups of five mice each. Twelve (12) groups were administered with four (4) graded doses of CEE, BUT and AQ fractions. The remaining two (2) groups were controls, {positive control (Albendazole, ABZ 10 mg/kg) and negative control (Distilled water, DW 5 mL/kg)}. Each of the estimated doses of the various fractions of A. montanuswere administered to mice (according to grouping previously described) for five consecutive days; on the 18th to 22nd days post infection (PI) 22. Doses were chosen at a common logarithmic interval of 0.08 for all extract-treated groups. All treatments were administered orally.

Postmortem Worm Count

On the 23rd day PI, all the mice were deprived of food but not water for 24 hours so as to empty the gastrointestinal tract to make worm counting easier. Mice were euthanized in chloroform chamber and necropsied. Modified method 23 was used for worm count.

Anthelmintic Evaluation

Anthelmintic efficacies of the extracts were accessed by counting the worms in the treated animals and comparing with counts from the untreated control mice. The percentage deparasitization (DP), (%DP- reduction in the worm counts) for the various groups was then calculated using the formula:


Where: N= mean worm count in untreated group.

n = mean worm count in treated groups 24.

Seventy percent (70%) reduction in worm count or more was considered significant at p<0.05 8.

Data Analysis

The worm count data generated were summarized in tables and expressed in percentages (percentage deparasitization). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's Multiple Comparison Post Test (Graphpad Instat) were used for data analysis. The results were expressed as Mean ± SEM. Difference between Means of treated and untreated control groups was considered significant at p<0.05.


Extraction of pulverized leaf of A. montanus showed that 1,000 g yielded 255.84 g of crude ethanol (EtOH) extract. Solvent partitioning of 100 g of crude (EtOH) extract yielded 31.42 g, 11.58 g and 3.00 g of aqueous (AQ), n-butanol (BuOH) and chloroform (CF) fractions (extracts) respectively. The remaining portion was discarded as residue. The colour and percentage yields of the plant material is as shown in Table 1. Generally, partitioning with water resulted in the highest quantity of crude extract, while CF gave the least quantity. Figure 1

Figure 1.TLC plates showing chromatogram of different portions of leaf extracts of A. montanus under visible light.
 TLC plates showing chromatogram of different portions of leaf extracts of A. montanus under visible light.

Table 1. Extract yield (% dry weight) from A. montanus leaf.
Extract Colour Yield (% w/w)
Crude EtOH Extract (CEE) Brown 25.58
Aqueous (AQ-extract) Fraction Light-brown 31.42
BuOH Fraction (n-butanol extract) Dark-brown 11.58
Chloroform Fraction (CF-extract) Dark-green 3.00

Qualitative Phytochemical Screening of Crude Ethanolic Leaf Extracts of A. Montanus

The results of qualitative phytochemical screening of CEE of A. montanus are as shown in Table 2. The major phytochemicals present in A. montanus leaf extract include glycosides, unsaturated steroids and triterpenes, saponins, tannins, flavonoids and alkaloids.

Table 2. Results of qualitative phytochemical screening of CEE of A. montanus.
Constituent(s) Test Observation Inference
Carbohydrates Molish Violet ring colour +
Glycosides Ferric chloride Dark brown coloration +
Free Anthracene Derivative Bontrager’s Light yellow coloration
Combined Anthracene Derivative Modified Bontrager’s Light yellow coloration
Unsaturated Steroid Liebermann Burchard Yellowish brown ppt +
Triterpenes Liebermann Burchard Reddish coloration +
Unsaturated sterols Salkowski Brownish coloration +
Cardiac glycoside Keller-kiliani Purple brown coloration +
Saponin glycoside Frothing Persistent (honey comb) froth +
Tannins (condensed) Ferric chloride Greenish-black ppt +
Tannins (hydrolysable) Ferric chloride Greenish-black ppt
Flavonoids Shinoda Dark red coloration +
Flavonoids Sodium hydroxide Yellow coloration +
Alkaloids Mayer’s Creamy white ppt +
Alkaloids Wagner’s Reddish brown ppt +
Alkaloids Dragendoff’s Orange brown ppt +

+ Test substance present; ‒ Test substance absent

 Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)

The chromatograms of TLC plates spotted with the various portions of A. montanussprayed with 1% FeCl3 are shown in Plate I. N-butanol (BUT) portion displayed more conspicuous spot followed by crude ethanol extract (CEE), then the aqueous (AQ) portion. Chloroform CHL(O) portion did not display any visible spot (under visible light). The Rf value which is depicted as retardation factor, rate of flow or retention factor for each spot was calculated and the same value obtained. This indicates a particular compound (solute) being eluted. This result shows that the compound is polar considering the eluting system (mobile phase) and the stationary phase (silica gel). The colour of the spots was greenish black. This is an evidence of phenolics (likely tannins, because of 1% FeCl3 spray reagent used) eluted.

Results of Anthelmintic Trials of Fractions of A. Montanus

There was a dose-dependent decrease in worm count in mice given each of the three preparations as shown in Table 3. Thus, for each extract, the highest worm count was seen in mice given the lowest dose of 1.2 g/kg; and the lowest count in those given the highest dose of 2.0 g/kg. For each dose level, mice given the n-butanol portion had the lowest worm counts, followed by those given the crude ethanol extract; and then those given the aqueous portion.

Table 3. Mean (± SEM) worm count in mice infected with 150 L3 of H. bakeri and orally treated for 5 consecutive days with varying doses of A. montanus leaf extracts, distilled water or albendazole 19 days post infection.
Dose (g/kg) Substance
CEE BUT AQ DW (5 mL/kg) ABZ (10 mg/kg)
1.2 10.40±0.51a (5) 6.67±0.33a (3) 12.67±0.88a (3) 20.25±1.11c (4) 0.00±0.00b (4)
1.4 8.20±0.86a (5) 4.20±0.37b (5) 10.80±0.58a (5)    
1.7 7.20±0.58a (5) 1.80±0.49b (5) 8.40±0.51a(4)    
2.0 5.60±0.33a (5) 0.60±0.40b (5) 7.50±0.65a(4)    

F=78.043 (MStreatment/MSresidual)     
5 mL/kg is the Maximum convenient volume (MCV)
5 mL/kg is the Maximum convenient volume (MCV)    
10 mg/kg is the Dose at manufacturer’s recommendation
10 mg/kg is the Dose at manufacturer’s recommendation    
a,b,c, differ significantly (p<0.05) from one another. Numbers in parenthesis show the number of mice up to the end of the experiment

 The worm counts of the albendazole-treated (0.00±0.00) positive control group was not significantly different (p>0.05) from the counts (0.60±0.40) of mice treated with n-butanol extract at the highest dose level of 2.0 g/kg. The degree of deparasitization (%) achieved by dosing with the extracts or albendazole or distilled water is the direct converse of the data on worm count (Table 4).

Table 4. Percentage deparasitization (%) in mice infected with 150 L3 of H. bakeri and orally treated for 5 consecutive days with varying doses of A. montanus leaf extracts, distilled water or albendazole 19 days post infection.
Dose (g/kg) Substance
CEE BUT AQ DW (5 mL/kg) ABZ (10 mg/kg)
1.2 48.64 67.06 37.43 0.000 100.0
1.4 59.51 86.17 46.67    
1.7 64.44 91.11 58.52    
2.0 72.35 97.04 62.96    

5 mL/kg is the Maximum convenient volume (MCV) 10 mg/kg is the Dose at manufacturer’s recommendation

 The n-butanol extract gave the highest rate of deparasitization at the four doses that were used. At 2.0 g/kg dose rate, the deparasitization rate achieved through n-butanol was 97% compared to 72.4% and 63% for crude ethanol extract and aqueous portion respectively. The deparasitization caused by n-butanol exract at any of the doses was significantly higher (p<0.05) compared to those caused by either crude ethanol extract or aqueous portion at such corresponding dose.


Acanthus montanus was selected according to earlier reports of anthelmintic efficacy 17 and folkloric claims. Among the fractions tested, n-butanol extractproduced profound anthelmintic activity. The degree of deparasitization obtained in this study is similar to that obtained from other studies with plants that were found to produce anthelmintic effects 25, 24. The results of the anthelmintic study indicate that n-butanol portion of A. montanusleaf produced significantly higher deparasitization followed by crude ethanol and then aqueous portions. The efficacy of the n-butanol extract (portion), for instance increased with dose, an indication of graded response of the parasite to the drug 26, 27. This is probably due to the activity of tannins that was found to be more in the n-butanol extract (fraction). Different classes of anthelmintics are known to show profound effects on the physical activities, generally culminating into loss of mobility and mortality of helminth parasites in a dose-dependent manner 28. The active principle(s) in the A. montanusextracts responsible for this anthelmintic activity might be individual phytocomponents as detected during phytochemical screening or a number of them working in synergy. Plant secondary metabolites found in this study have been reported to occur in other plants with anthelmintic activity 25, 7. In the present study, tannins (condensed tannins) were likely responsible for the observed profound anthelmintic activity 29 due to its abundance in the extract screened phytochemically and confirmed by thin layer chromatography. Chemically, tannins are polyphenolic compounds which are uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation in helminth parasites 30. Some synthetic phenolic anthelmintics as niclosamide, oxyclozanide and bithionol, are reported to interfere with energy generation in helminth parasites by uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation 31. It is possible that the large amount of tannins detected in the n-butanol leaf extracts of A. montanus produced similar effects. Another possible anthelmintic effect of tannins is that they can bind to free proteins in the gastrointestinal tracts of host animal 32 or glycoprotein on the cuticle of the parasite 33, and may thus cause death.

Polyphenolic compounds which are reported to be present in leaves of mainly dicotyledonous plants are potent anthelmintics. Condensed tannins which are derived from flavonol are soluble in water and are capable of precipitating proteins. They are reported to be found in cell walls or stored in vacuoles, stems, leaves, flowers or seeds 34, 35. Tannins protect the intestine from reinfection by “tanning” proteins in the lining of the gut (intestine) 36. Consumption of vegetative portions of such plants is advocated. This may explain why the plant’s (A. montanus) aerial parts are used as vermifuge by the Etulo natives of Benue State, Nigeria. Its tannin content may explain its anthelmintic activity.


This study has demonstrated that the n-butanol extracts of Acanthus montanus leaf has profound anthelmintic activity against experimental Heligmosomoidesbakeri infection in mice. It is therefore recommended that further investigations should be carried out on A. montanusleaf extracts to explore it commercial potential in the treatment of helminths of animals and humans. Also, detail evaluation of the significance of retention factor (Rf) of tannins from Thin layer chromatography of 0.53 is to be investigated. The secondary plant metabolites detected from A. montanusleaf might be responsible for anthelmintic activities singly or in synergy especially the n-butanol extract.


  1. 1.J A Hammond, Fielding D, S C Bishop. (1997) Prospects for plant anthelmintics in tropical Veterinary Medicine.Veterinary Resource. Communication,21: 213-228.
  1. 2.B D Perry, T F Randolph. (1999) Improving the assessment of the economic impact of parasitic disease and of their control in production animals.Veterinary. Parasitology,84: 145-168.
  1. 3.L J McGaw, J N Eloff. (2008) Ethnoveterinary use of southern African plants and scientific evaluation of their medicinal properties.Journal of Ethnopharmacology,119:. 559-574.
  1. 4.Behnke J, P D Harris.(2010).Heligmosomoidesbakeri: anew name for an old worm?Trends in Parasitology,26(11):. 524-529.
  1. 5.D A Al-Bassel, F M Stietieh, A M Farrag. (2000) On the morphology ofHeligmosomoidespolygyrus(Nematoda-Trichostrongylidae) from the field mouseApodemussylvaticus. , Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 30(1), 43-49.
  1. 6.R J Pleass, A E Bianco. (1995) The effects of gamma radiation on the development ofHeligmosomoidespolygyrusbakeriin mice. , International Journal for Parasitology 25(9), 1099-1109.
  1. 7.P J Wabo, O F Tankoua, Yondo J, M C Komtangi, Mbida M. (2011) Theinvitroeffects of aqueous and ethanolic extract of leaves ofAgeratumconizoides(Asteraceae) on three life cycle stages of the parasitic NematodeHeligmosomoidesbakeri(Nematoda, Heligmosomatidae).Veterinary Medicine International,1.
  1. 8.S O Enejoh, Shuaibu K, Suleiman M M, J O Ajanusi. (2014) Evaluation of anthelmintic efficacy of citrus aurantifolia (christm) fruit juice against heligmosomoides bakeri. , International Journal of Advanced Biological Research 4(4), 448-45.
  1. 9.Belemlilga M, Traoré A, Belemnaba L, Kini F B, Sylvin O S. (2019) . Ovicidal and Larvicidal Activities ofSaba senegalensis(ADC) Pichon (Apocynaceae) Extracts and Fractions onHeligmosomoidesbakeri(Nematoda, Heligmosomatidae).Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International 1-13.
  1. 10.R D Gregory, A E Keymer, J R Clarke. (1990) Genetics, Sex and Exposure: The Ecology ofHeligmosomoidespolygyrus(Nematoda) in the Wood Mouse. , Journal of Animal Ecology 59(1), 363-378.
  1. 11.Githiori J B, Höglund J, Waller P J, Baker R L. (2003) The anthelmintic efficacy of the plant,Albiziaanthelmintica, against the nematode parasitesHaemonchuscontortusof sheep andHeligmosomoidespolygyrusof mice.Veterinary Parasitology. 116(1), 23-34.
  1. 12.Eguale T, Tilahun G, Debella A, Felake A, Makonnen E. (2007) vitroandin vivoanthelminthic activity of crude extracts of Coriandrum sativum against Heamonchus contortus. , Journal of Ethnophaemacology 110, 428-433.
  1. 13.A J Huxley. (1992) The New Royal Horticultural Society Dictionary of Gardening. London: Macmillan;Acanthusmontanusplant description and geographical distribution. http://wwwdoacs.state.flaus/pi/enpp/98mar.apr.htm
  1. 14.Sanganuwan S A. (2009) Tropical plants with antihypertensive, antiasthmatic and antidiabetic value.Journal of herbs, spices and medicinal plants,15:. 24-44.
  1. 15.Igoli J O, Ogaji O G, Tor-Anyiin T, Igoli N P. (2005) Traditional Medicine Practice amongst the Igede people of Nigeria Part II. , African Journal Traditional Complimenary and Alternative Medicines 2(2), 134-152.
  1. 16.E C Agishi.(2004).Etulo,Idoma,Tivand Hausa names of plants.Agitab Pub.Ltd.Makurdi.
  1. 17.Adamu M, Oshadu O D, Ogbaje C I. (2010) Anthelmintic efficacy of aqueous extract of Acanthus montanus leaf against strongylid nematodes of small ruminants. , African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine 7(4), 279-285.
  1. 18.W C Evans. (2002) . Trease and Evans ‟Pharmacology” 15th Edition, W.B , New York 221-393.
  1. 19.Mehta S. (2012) Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC): Principles (with Animation), On-line [AccessedMay11,2012].
  1. 20.J B Harborne. (1984) Phytochemical methods: a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis,2ndedition. London:Chapman and Hall.
  1. 21.C H Burren. (1980) . , Zeitschrift fur Parasitenkunde 62, 111-112.
  1. 22.Lai S C. (2006) Chinese herbarbal medicine Yin-Chen extract as adjunt to anthelmintic albendazole used against Angiostrongylus cantonensis-induced eosinophilic meningitis or meningoencephalitis. , American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 75(3), 556-562.
  1. 23.Johnston C J, Robertson E, Harcus Y, Grainger Coakley.. G,et al.(2015). Cultivation ofHeligmosomoidespolygyrus:An Immunomodulatory Nematode Parasite and its Secreted Products.Journal of Visualized Experiments,(98), e52412 .
  1. 24.Jegede O C, Agbede RIS, Ajanusi J O, Adaudi A O. (2009) Anthelmintic screening of fractions ofSpigeliaanthelmiaLinn. extracts against experimentalNippostrongylusbrasiliensisin rats.VeterinarskiArhiv,79(2):. 189-197.
  1. 25.Suleiman M M, Mamman M, Aliu Y O, Ajanusi J O, Abubakar M S. (2005) . Anthelmintic Effect of Extracts of Terminaliaavicennioides Against Experimental Nippostrongylosis in Rats,Journal of Herbs, Spices, and Medicinal Plants,11(3): 117-126.
  1. 26.Iqbal Z, Lateef M, Jabbar A, Muhammad G, M N Khan. (2006) Anthelmintic activity ofVernoniaanthelseeds againstTrichostrongylidnematodes of sheep.Pharmaceutical Biology,44(8):. 563-567.
  1. 27.Iqbal Z, Lateef M, Jabbar A, Muhammad G, A H Gilani.(2006b).In vitroanthelmintic activity ofNicotianatobacumLinn. leaves against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep.Phytotherapy Research,20(1):. 46-48.
  1. 28.S H Xiao, Guo J, Chollet J, J T Wu, Tarma M. (2004) Effect of artemether onSchistosomamansoni:dose-efficacy relationship, and change in worm morphology and histopatholoy.ChineeseJournal of Parasitological Diseases,22:. 148-153.
  1. 29.J H Niezen, G C Waghorn, Charlestone W A G, G C Waghorn. (1995) Growth and gastrointestinal parasitism in lambs grazing either Lucerne (Medicago sativa) or sulla (Hedysarumcoronarium), which contains condensed tannins.Journal of Agricultural Science,125:. 281-289.
  1. 30.E C Bate-Smith. (1962) The phenolic constituents of plants and their taxonomic significance. , Dicotyledons.Journal of Linn Society Botany,58: 95-117.
  1. 31.R J Martin. (1997) Mode of actions of anthelmintic drugs.Veterinary. Journal,154: 11-34.
  1. 32.Athanasiadou S, Kyriazakis I, Jackson F, R L Coop. (2001) Direct anthelmintic effect of condensed tannins towards different gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep:In vitroandin vivostudies.Veterinary. Parasitology,99: 205-219.
  1. 33.D P Thompson, T G Geary. (1995) The structure and function of helminth surfaces.In:Biochemistryand Molecular Biology of parasites. , Marr, J.J 203-235.
  1. 34.R T McMahon, T A McAllister, B P, Majiak W, S N Acharya. (2000) A review of effects of forage condensed tannins on ruminal fermentatation and bloat in grazing cattle.Canadian. , Journal of Plant Science,80: 469-485.
  1. 35.Acuna H, Concha A, Figueroa M. (2008) Condensed tannins concentrations of three Lotus species grown in different environments. , Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 68(1), 31-41.
  1. 36.Wallace D. (2012) Papaya power! (which includes papaya enzymes to aid in gluten digestion).Eat Smart, The Eating Revolution.http:/ (Online Article accessed on5thMay,2021).