Journal of Evolving Stem Cell Research

Journal Of Evolving Stem Cell Research

Journal of Evolving Stem Cell Research

Current Issue Volume No: 1 Issue No: 1

Review Article Open Access Available online freely Peer Reviewed Citation

Evaluating Circadian Oscillators in Cancer Stem Cells

1Bowling Green State University, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green, OH 43403


Cancer is influenced by the ability of cells to maintain circadian rhythms in molecular and metabolic processes. Disturbance of the underlying circadian timing mechanism in circadian clock cells leads to a higher frequency and more rapid progression of cancer. Cancer stem cells with properties of embryonic and somatic stem cells have been implicated as tumor initiators in several types of cancers. Although tumors are reported to have disorganized circadian rhythms, evidence of in vitro circadian rhythms in cancer stem cells of gliomas was recently presented. The possibility and consequences of circadian clocks functioning in cancer stem cells within tumors is examined, and the possible benefits to these cells from circadian timing is discussed in relation to cancer treatments.

Author Contributions
Received 31 Aug 2014; Accepted 11 Mar 2015; Published 01 Jun 2015;

Academic Editor: Heidi Abrahamse, Laser Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Checked for plagiarism: Yes

Review by: Single-blind

Copyright ©  2015 Michael E.Geusz, et al.

Creative Commons License     This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


Michael E. Geusz, Vishal P. Sharma, Ashapurna Sarma, Astha Malik (2015) Evaluating Circadian Oscillators in Cancer Stem Cells. Journal Of Evolving Stem Cell Research - 1(1):1-9.

Download as RIS, BibTeX, Text (Include abstract )

DOI 10.14302/issn.2574-4372.jesr-14-607


Circadian Rhythms and Cancer Cell Survival

The relationship between circadian rhythms and cancer is generally thought to be one of mutual exclusion. Circadian rhythms are approximately 24-hour oscillations in physiology or behavior that are reported to be either poorly defined or lacking in cancer cells 1, 2, 3. Similarly, robust circadian rhythms are thought to suppress carcinogenesis and tumor growth 4, 5, 6. The benefits provided by circadian timing have been discussed and reviewed elsewhere in relation to events external to the organism 7, 8, 9, 10. The ability to anticipate daily occurrence of food sources, favorable temperatures, and mates or avoid predictable hazards such as predators and environmental stressors are just some of the potential benefits offered by the clock that provide adaptive value.

Probably because of adversely timed light exposure and the disrupted circadian timing system that follows 11, individuals working night shifts are reported to have higher incidences of breast cancer 12, 13 and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma 14. A major cause appears to be light-induced alterations in the daily oscillations of the hormone melatonin 15, 19, a possible cancer suppressor 20, 21, 22, although not all studies support this mechanism 23. Altered rhythms in cortisol and other factors that provide timing information throughout the body may also be involved in the effects of light exposure and circadian disturbances during nighttime work 24, 25, 26. Circadian timing disruption might indirectly promote cancer by fostering obesity and the metabolic syndrome 27 or by shortening sleep duration 28, 29, 30. A more proximal cause is shown by the loss of circadian timing in mice or cancer cell lines, through knockout of critical core genes within the timing mechanism, which increases cancer occurrence, progression and invasiveness 6, 31, 32, 33, 34. Circadian clock gene expression is also disrupted and repressed in stomach and colon cancer tissue 35, 36, 37, and recent evidence suggests that sequence variations within clock genes can elevate cancer risk 38, 39, 40, 41.

Essentially, what has emerged is a homeostasis-based view that a poor clock enables aggressive cancer 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51. This short review will examine an additional perspective: that some cancer cells may benefit from circadian rhythms and that tumors may have significant timing abilities. In fact, cancer stem cells (CSCs) may undergo selection for a circadian timing mechanism that could have unique properties in part because of their hypoxic environment 49. CSCs are distinct among cancer cells in many ways. They divide slowly, thereby evading antimitotic cancer therapies, but can differentiate into rapidly proliferating progenitor cells forming the mass of most tumors. They are also endowed with elevated levels of transmembrane drug transporters (e.g., ABCG2), toxin-degrading enzymes (aldehyde dehydrogenase), and anti-apoptotic transcriptional activators (NFκB) 52, 53, 54, 55. They share with embryogenic and adult stem cells a reliance on the stem cell-maintaining Notch, Wnt/β-catenin, and Hedgehog signaling pathways 56. The ability of CSCs to survive hypoxia through reliance on glycolysis, as shown in ovarian CSCs 57, suggests that their circadian timing mechanism might have unusual capabilities not used in non-stem cancer cells or non-cancerous cells. Recent discoveries of how metabolic pathways interact with circadian clocks 58 might be advanced by examining CSC circadian oscillators.

Cells can receive circadian timing from other clocks within the body 59 or they can produce their own rhythmic signal through interacting transcriptional and translational molecular loops 60. Both sources of timing information have their value. For example, regulation through endocrine 61 or neural timing signals from central circadian pacemakers, such as the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus 8, obviates the metabolic costs to cells in maintaining their own timing mechanism. On the other hand, intrinsic timing capabilities endow the cell with the potential to maintain its timing during events that transiently desynchronize the circadian system as a whole. Causes of this timing disruption can be sleep deprivation, illness or, in the modern world, jet lag 62.

The often stated claim that all cells of the body contain a circadian clock falls short when considering available evidence. Many types of cells have not been examined. Furthermore, cells of the testis have not been found to have circadian rhythms, despite much examination 63, 64, although they do express clock genes such as Per1 and Per2. Similarly, embryonic cells are reported to lack a circadian clock, but a rhythm appears upon their differentiation 65. Some adult stem cells, such as those in the skin, do contain a circadian clock 66, 67. One possible disadvantage to the organism from having intrinsic cellular timing capabilities distributed in multiple cells of the body is that mutations in some clock cells, as well as their clones, may drive them into a rogue timing state in which their altered circadian rhythms conflict with nearby cells. Such a mutation could lead to an altered period or phase relationship with the rest of the circadian system that impairs timing in cells with which they interact.

Opportunities and Challenges Provided by Circadian CSCs

Because of the genetic damage observed in cancer cells, it is possible that their circadian clocks oscillate with an abnormal phase relative to their tissue of origin. Obviously, such a feature could be exploited through daily drug delivery at a particular phase of the cycle to preferentially act on the cancer cells. A more sobering concern is that any therapy designed to improve circadian timing in a cancer patient might also help to strengthen a clock within cancer cells; if circadian timing aids some cancer cells, this approach could ultimately prove damaging. One benefit provided to a cancer cell by its own circadian clock is that it might help in evading circadian oscillations in cell-destroying lymphocytes or melatonin. Although most of the tumor might have a disorganized and ineffective circadian clock, any treatment that enables circadian oscillators identified within CSCs should be considered carefully.

CSCs and somatic stem cells are typically a small population within cell lines or primary cultures and therefore may have only been an insignificant contribution to many studies of circadian rhythms in vitro, particularly ones that failed to detect a circadian rhythm 2. Consequently, circadian properties of CSCs and other stem cells have remained mostly unexamined. The C6 rat glioma cell line contains CSCs 68, 69, 70, and we recently provided evidence that CSCs in attached, monolayer C6 cell cultures lack circadian rhythms, although rhythms were present in the remaining non-stem cancer cells 71, in agreement with previous studies that measured the entire cell population 72. Surprisingly, tumorsphere cultures containing mostly quiescent CSCs displayed circadian rhythms in Per2 expression 71. Because tumorspheres are enriched in CSCs and contain a cell microenvironment resembling that of tumor cells, extrapolation suggests that CSCs within gliomas also contain functional circadian clocks. The same may be true of CSCs within other tumors, and these oscillators may depend on paracrine factors or other cell coupling signals that attached cells do not experience at sufficient concentrations to sustain a rhythm. A parallel process occurs in fibroblast circadian pacemakers that fail to oscillate at low cell density, as shown by single-cell imaging 73.

Obviously, an ideal technology would provide continuous monitoring of individual cells within tumors of live animals, but lacking that the best estimate of tumor rhythms is through ensemble recordings from multiple oscillating tumor cells. If these clocks are not synchronized to the animal’s circadian system in a predictable way, then methods similar to those used to shift clock cells in vitro into a common circadian phase should be developed. A common method in use for cell lines, tissue explants and tumorspheres is a two-hour application of elevated (50%) serum, forskolin, dexamethasone, or a temperature pulse followed by return to normal cell culture medium 74, 75, 76, 77. Any circadian clock cells refractive to these stimuli would, of course, not contribute to measured rhythms, unless their oscillator couples its phase to more responsive cellular clocks. It is also conceivable that refractive clock cells might instead couple to each other, producing a second rhythmic component within the measured signal, giving the appearance of an arrhythmic tumor. It should be noted that many agents used to synchronize circadian cell cultures can also induce differentiation of CSCs 71.

The impression that tumors lack organized or functional circadian clocks is challenged by a recent report of how sarcoma and fibrosarcoma tissue explants grown in immunocompromised mice or in culture do express circadian rhythms in clock gene expression, and they are entrained to the host circadian system 78. Similarly, tumors grown in mice are reported to show circadian rhythms in the clock gene Bmal1 that are in phase with host circadian rhythms 79.

As in the daily mitotic rhythms of normal tissues, the molecular linkages between the circadian clock and the cell cycle are often cited as instrumental in tumor growth 80, 81, 82. A loss of circadian timing in cancer cells might free mitosis from this constraint, enabling rapid proliferation 83. Both empirical data and mathematical modeling describe a “phase-locking” between normal cell cycle and circadian oscillations in many organisms 84, 85. Nevertheless, the relationship is certainly not obligate; the cell cycle can proceed considerably faster than 24 hours in cancer and non-cancer cell lines, including C6, while the circadian rhythm persists 86, 87. Selectively altering the period of mitotic oscillations leaves the circadian rhythm intact 86. This uncoupling again supports our contention that circadian clocks are more abundant in tumors than currently perceived, and CSCs could be the most rhythmic of the many cell types present despite their lack of easy observation. Most of the recorded tumor signal can originate in the many other cell types present including numerous non-cancerous stromal cells, particularly when using tissue mRNA assays.

Tumor heterogeneity is apparent in cell cultures and solid tumors. It confounds chemotherapeutic strategies and challenges any easy understanding of cell interactions during cancer progression. Theories based on CSCs as tumor-initiating cells argue that tumor heterogeneity proceeds by way of multiple differentiation events, from CSCs onward, making each tumor a somewhat unique population of difficult drug targets.


Internal processes of the body may selectively favor persistence of CSC clocks that have optimal phase relationships with daily rhythms in nutrient availability, cytokines, hormones, and suppressive or mitogenic components oscillating in the blood. Similarly, various organs of animals oscillate with their own preferred circadian phase relative to the master neural clock in the hypothalamus 88. Directing clinical or preventative treatments towards the unique properties of CSCs is therefore a promising approach, and if CSCs prove to have a distinct circadian timing mechanism or phase, then that becomes an important asset for the oncologist. Chronopharmacological approaches for treating cancer could be refined to eliminate CSCs preferentially. As CSCs of various human cancers become better understood they should be screened for their circadian properties and their phase relationships with known physiological rhythms so that their most vulnerable phases can be targeted for treatment.


  1. 1.Xiang S. (2012) Oscillation of clock and clock controlled genes induced by serum shock in human breast epithelial and breast cancer cells: regulation by melatonin. , Breast Cancer (Auckl) 6, 137-50.
  1. 2.Rossetti S. (2012) Entrainment of breast (cancer) epithelial cells detects distinct circadian oscillation patterns for clock and hormone receptor genes. , Cell Cycle 11(2), 350-60.
  1. 3.Yu E A, Weaver D R. (2011) Disrupting the circadian clock: gene-specific effects on aging, cancer, and other phenotypes. Aging. , (Albany NY) 3(5), 479-93.
  1. 4.Rana S, Mahmood S. (2010) Circadian rhythm and its role in malignancy. , J Circadian Rhythms 8, 3.
  1. 5.Li X M. (2010) Cancer inhibition through circadian reprogramming of tumor transcriptome with meal timing. , Cancer Res 70(8), 3351-60.
  1. 6.Yang X. (2009) The circadian clock gene Per1 suppresses cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth at specific times of day. , Chronobiol Int 26(7), 1323-39.
  1. 7.Marques M D, Waterhouse J M. (1994) Masking and the evolution of circadian rhythmicity. , Chronobiol Int 11(3), 146-55.
  1. 8.Menaker M, Takahashi J S, Eskin A. (1978) The physiology of circadian pacemakers. , Annu Rev Physiol 40, 501-26.
  1. 9.Wirz-Justice A, Wever R A, Aschoff J. (1984) Seasonality in freerunning circadian rhythms in man. , Naturwissenschaften 71(6), 316-9.
  1. 10.DeCoursey P J. (2014) Survival value of suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) in four wild sciurid rodents. , Behav Neurosci 128(3), 240-9.
  1. 11.Shi F. (2013) Aberrant DNA methylation of miR-219 promoter in long-term night shiftworkers. , Environ Mol Mutagen 54(6), 406-13.
  1. 12.Hansen J, Lassen C F. (2012) Nested case-control study of night shift work and breast cancer risk among women in the Danish military. , Occup Environ Med 69(8), 551-6.
  1. 13.Stevens R G. (2014) Breast cancer and circadian disruption from electric lighting in the modern world. , CA Cancer J Clin 64(3), 207-18.
  1. 14.Lahti T A. (2008) Night-time work predisposes to non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , Int J Cancer 123(9), 2148-51.
  1. 15.Leonardi G C. (2012) Correlation of the risk of breast cancer and disruption of the circadian rhythm (Review). , Oncol Rep 28(2), 418-28.
  1. 16.Blask D E. (2011) Circadian regulation of molecular, dietary, and metabolic signaling mechanisms of human breast cancer growth by the nocturnal melatonin signal and the consequences of its disruption by light at night. , J Pineal Res 51(3), 259-69.
  1. 17.Costa G, Haus E, Stevens R. (2010) Shift work and cancer - considerations on rationale, mechanisms, and epidemiology. , Scand J Work Environ Health 36(2), 163-79.
  1. 18.Blask D E. (2009) Melatonin, sleep disturbance and cancer risk. , Sleep Med Rev 13(4), 257-64.
  1. 19.Hurley S. (2014) Light at night and breast cancer risk among california teachers. , Epidemiology 25(5), 697-706.
  1. 20.Liu R. (2013) Melatonin enhances DNA repair capacity possibly by affecting genes involved in DNA damage responsive pathways. , BMC Cell Biol 14, 1.
  1. 21.Trivedi A K, Kumar V. (2014) Melatonin: an internal signal for daily and seasonal timing. , Indian J Exp Biol 52(5), 425-37.
  1. 22.Wang X S. (2014) First-morning urinary melatonin and breast cancer risk in the Guernsey Study. , Am J Epidemiol 179(5), 584-93.
  1. 23.Peplonska B. (2012) Rotating night shift work and mammographic density. , Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(7), 1028-37.
  1. 24.H C Abercrombie. (2004) Flattened cortisol rhythms in metastatic breast cancer patients. , Psychoneuroendocrinology 29(8), 1082-92.
  1. 25.P D Mavroudis. (2012) Entrainment of peripheral clock genes by cortisol. Physiol Genomics. 44(11), 607-21.
  1. 26.D M Holman. (2014) Opportunities for cancer prevention during midlife: highlights from a meeting of experts. Am J Prev Med,46(3 Suppl1): 73-80.
  1. 27.Garaulet M, J M Ordovas, J A Madrid. (2010) The chronobiology, etiology and pathophysiology of obesity. , Int J Obes (Lond) 34(12), 1667-83.
  1. 28.S M Gapstur. (2014) Work schedule, sleep duration, insomnia, and risk of fatal prostate cancer. Am J Prev Med.46(3 Suppl1): 26-33.
  1. 29.B J Hahm. (2014) Bedtime misalignment and progression of breast cancer. Chronobiol Int. 31(2), 214-21.
  1. 30.M K Luojus. (2014) Sleep duration and incidence of lung cancer in ageing men. , BMC Public Health 14, 295.
  1. 31.Lee S. (2010) Disrupting circadian homeostasis of sympathetic signaling promotes tumor development in mice. PLoS ONE. 5(6), 10995.
  1. 32.A E Hoffman. (2010) Phenotypic effects of the circadian gene Cryptochrome 2 on cancer-related pathways. , BMC Cancer 10, 110.
  1. 33.P A Wood, Yang X, W J Hrushesky. (2009) Clock genes and cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 8(4), 303-8.
  1. 34.Xue X.Silencing NPAS2 promotes cell growth and invasion in DLD-1 cells and correlated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer. , Biochem Biophys Res Commun 450(2), 1058-62.
  1. 35.M L Hu. (2014) Deregulated expression of circadian clock genes in gastric cancer. , BMC Gastroenterol 14, 67.
  1. 36.Karantanos T. (2014) Clock genes: their role in colorectal cancer. , World J Gastroenterol 20(8), 1986-92.
  1. 37.Zhao H. (2014) Prognostic relevance of Period1 (Per1) and Period2 (Per2) expression in human gastric cancer. , Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7(2), 619-30.
  1. 38.Elzawahry A. (2014) Innate immunity interactome dynamics. Gene Regul Syst Bio. 8, 1-15.
  1. 39.N M Kettner, C A Katchy, Fu L. (2014) Circadian gene variants in cancer. Ann Med. 46(4), 208-20.
  1. 40.Kondratov R. (2014) Circadian clock and cancer therapy: an unexpected journey. Ann Med. 46(4), 189-90.
  1. 41.Madden M H. (2014) Circadian pathway genes in relation to glioma risk and outcome. Cancer Causes Control. 25(1), 25-32.
  1. 42.Ahowesso C. (2011) Sex and dosing-time dependencies in irinotecan-induced circadian disruption. Chronobiol Int. 28(5), 458-70.
  1. 43.Li S. (2013) CLOCK is a substrate of SUMO and sumoylation of CLOCK upregulates the transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor-alpha. Oncogene. 32(41), 4883-91.
  1. 44.Hwang-Verslues W W. (2013) Loss of corepressor PER2 under hypoxia up-regulates OCT1-mediated EMT gene expression and enhances tumor malignancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A .
  1. 45.Sephton S E. (2012) Diurnal cortisol rhythm as a predictor of lung cancer survival. Brain Behav Immun.
  1. 46.Mazzoccoli G, Giuliani F, Sothern R B. (2012) Determination of whole body circadian phase in lung cancer patients: melatonin vs. , cortisol. Cancer Epidemiol 36(1), 46-53.
  1. 47.E P Markova-Car. (2014) Running for time: circadian rhythms and melanoma. Tumour Biol.
  1. 48.Mate I, J A Madrid, Fuente M De la. (2014) Chronobiology of the neuroimmunoendocrine system and aging. , Curr Pharm Des 20(29), 4642-55.
  1. 49.Mazzoccoli G. (2014) Circadian clock circuitry in colorectal cancer. , World J Gastroenterol 20(15), 4197-207.
  1. 50.Papagerakis S. (2014) The circadian clock in oral health and diseases. J Dent Res. 93(1), 27-35.
  1. 51.Levi F. (2000) Therapeutic implications of circadian rhythms in cancer patients. , Novartis Found Symp,discussion136-42 227, 119-36.
  1. 52.M R Alison, S M Lim, L J Nicholson. (2011) Cancer stem cells: problems for therapy? J Pathol. 223(2), 147-61.
  1. 53.R C D'Angelo, M S Wicha. (2010) Stem cells in normal development and cancer. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 95, 113-58.
  1. 54.Mo W, J T Zhang.Human ABCG2: structure, function, and its role in multidrug resistance. , Int J Biochem Mol Biol 3(1), 1-27.
  1. 55.Zhang L. (2014) The NFkappaB inhibitor, SN50, induces differentiation of glioma stem cells and suppresses their oncogenic phenotype. Cancer Biol Ther. 15(5), 602-11.
  1. 56.G J Prud'homme. (2012) Cancer stem cells and novel targets for antitumor strategies. Curr Pharm Des. 18(19), 2838-49.
  1. 57.Liao J. (2014) Ovarian cancer spheroid cells with stem cell-like properties contribute to tumor generation, metastasis and chemotherapy resistance through hypoxia-resistant metabolism. PLoS ONE. 9(1), 84941.
  1. 58.Sahar S. (2014) Circadian control of fatty acid elongation by SIRT1 protein-mediated deacetylation of acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase 1. , J Biol Chem 289(9), 6091-7.
  1. 59.K L Gamble. (2014) Circadian clock control of endocrine factors. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 10(8), 466-75.
  1. 60.Hirota T, Fukada Y. (2004) Resetting mechanism of central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Zoolog Sci. 21(4), 359-68.
  1. 61.Abrahamsen J F. (1993) Circadian variation in serum cortisol and circulating neutrophils are markers for circadian variation of bone marrow proliferation in cancer patients. , Eur J Haematol 50(4), 206-12.
  1. 62.Iwamoto A. (2014) Effects of chronic jet lag on the central and peripheral circadian clocks in CBA/N mice. Chronobiol Int. 31(2), 189-98.
  1. 63.Mazzoccoli G. (2012) Clock gene expression in mouse kidney and testis: analysis of periodical and dynamical patterns. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 26(2), 303-11.
  1. 64.Morse D. (2003) No circadian rhythms in testis: Period1 expression is clock independent and developmentally regulated in the mouse. Mol Endocrinol. 17(1), 141-51.
  1. 65.Yagita K. (2010) Development of the circadian oscillator during differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(8), 3846-51.
  1. 66.Janich P, Q J Meng, S A Benitah. (2014) Circadian control of tissue homeostasis and adult stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 31C 8-15.
  1. 67.Janich P. (2011) The circadian molecular clock creates epidermal stem cell heterogeneity. Nature. 480(7376), 209-14.
  1. 68.X D Zhou. (2009) Detection of cancer stem cells from the C6 glioma cell line. , J Int Med Res 37(2), 503-10.
  1. 69.Zhang S J. (2011) Comparative study on the stem cell phenotypes of C6 cells under different culture conditions. , Chin Med J (Engl) 124(19), 3118-26.
  1. 70.Kondo T, Setoguchi T, Taga T. (2004) Persistence of a small subpopulation of cancer stem-like cells in the C6 glioma cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(3), 781-6.
  1. 71.V P Sharma, N T Anderson, M E Geusz. (2014) Circadian properties of cancer stem cells in glioma cell cultures and tumorspheres. Cancer Lett. 345(1), 65-74.
  1. 72.Fujioka A, Takashima N, Shigeyoshi Y. (2006) Circadian rhythm generation in a glioma cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 346(1), 169-74.
  1. 73.Noguchi T, Wang L L, Welsh D K. (2013) Fibroblast PER2 circadian rhythmicity depends on cell density. , J Biol Rhythms 28(3), 183-92.
  1. 74.S R Moore. (2014) Robust circadian rhythms in organoid cultures from PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE mouse small intestine. Dis Model Mech. 7(9), 1123-30.
  1. 75.Balsalobre A, Marcacci L, Schibler U. (2000) Multiple signaling pathways elicit circadian gene expression in cultured Rat-1 fibroblasts. Current Biology. 10(20), 1291-1294.
  1. 76.Pezuk P. (2012) Glucocorticoids as entraining signals for peripheral circadian oscillators. Endocrinology. 153(10), 4775-83.
  1. 77.Tamaru T. (2011) Synchronization of circadian Per2 rhythms and HSF1-BMAL1:CLOCK interaction in mouse fibroblasts after short-term heat shock pulse. PLoS ONE. 6(9), 24521.
  1. 78.Comas M. (2014) Daily rhythms are retained both in spontaneously developed sarcomas and in xenografts grown in immunocompromised SCID mice. Chronobiol Int. 1-10.
  1. 79.Huang A. (2014) Circadian clock gene expression regulates cancer cell growth through glutaminase. Acta Biochim Biophys. , Sin (Shanghai) 46(5), 409-14.
  1. 80.F C Kelleher, Rao A, Maguire A. (2014) Circadian molecular clocks and cancer. Cancer Lett. 342(1), 9-18.
  1. 81.Sotak M, Sumova A, Pacha J. (2014) Cross-talk between the circadian clock and the cell cycle in cancer. Ann Med. 46(4), 221-32.
  1. 82.Reddy A B. (2005) Circadian clocks: neural and peripheral pacemakers that impact upon the cell division cycle. Mutat Res,574(1-2):. 76-91.
  1. 83.Rana S. (2014) Deregulated expression of circadian clock and clock-controlled cell cycle genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Mol Biol Rep. 41(1), 95-103.
  1. 84.Feillet C. (2014) Phase locking and multiple oscillating attractors for the coupled mammalian clock and cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(27), 9828-33.
  1. 85.C I Hong. (2014) Circadian rhythms synchronize mitosis in Neurospora crassa. , Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(4), 1397-402.
  1. 86.J S Pendergast. (2010) Disconnected circadian and cell cycles in a tumor-driven cell line. Commun Integr Biol. 3(6), 536-9.
  1. 87.Yeom M. (2010) Circadian-independent cell mitosis in immortalized fibroblasts. , Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(21), 9665-70.
  1. 88.Yoo S H. (2004) PERIOD2: LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues. , Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(15), 5339-46.