Journal of Neurological Research and Therapy
ISSN: 2470-5020
Current Issue
Volume No: 3 Issue No: 2
share this page

Review Article | Open Access
  • Available online freely | Peer Reviewed
  • Neuroscience Theories, Hypothesis and Approaches to ASD Physiopathology. A Review

    Castejón OJ 1      

    1Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas “Drs. Orlando Castejón and Haydee Viloria de Castejón” e Instituto de Neurociencias Clínicas, Fundación Castejón, San Rafael Clinical Home. Maracaibo. Venezuela.


    According to the results of our laboratory the theory of immune dysfunction, the theory on the genetic architecture of ASD, the disrupted cortical connectivity theory and the theory on the contribution of cerebellum to ASD have shown fundamental experimental evidences to support the core symptoms of the complex and enigmatic physiopathology of autism spectrum disorder. The additional hypothesis about the neurogenesis in the amygdala, the contribution of oxytocin, vasopressin, the mirror neuron network, and mitochondrial dysfunction described are stimulating and interesting approaches that deserve further systematic basic and clinical neuroscience research.

    Received 20 Jul 2019; Accepted 28 Aug 2019; Published 29 Aug 2019;

    Academic Editor:Sidharth Mehan, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, ISF College of Pharmacy (ISFCP), Ghal Kalan, Ferozpur G.T. Road, Moga-42001, Punjab, India

    Checked for plagiarism: Yes

    Review by: Single-blind

    Copyright©  2019 Castejón

    Creative Commons License    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

    Competing interests

    The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


    Castejón OJ (2019) Neuroscience Theories, Hypothesis and Approaches to ASD Physiopathology. A Review. Journal of Neurological Research And Therapy - 3(2):1-12.
    Download as RIS, BibTeX, Text (Include abstract )


    In a previous paper 1 (Castejón et al.,2019) we have reported a clinical study on 75 infant patients from 3 to 15 years with autism spectrum disorder in a developing country.These patients exhibited disconnected brain with social isolation (80%), hyperconnected children (5%), creative child, (Asperger syndrome) (10%), stereotypic movements of hands and body (10%), psicomotor retard (5%), behavioral changes such as aggresivity and autoagressivity (10%), crisis of tears (1%), separation anxiety (1%), mood disorders ( 3%), photofobia (1%), loss of weight, (1%), routinised patterns of though and fantastic thoughts (2%), language disorders such as delay in the onset of language or early vocalization, regressive changes of language, mutism, gestual language, escatologic language, digital language (5%), learning and memory deficit (10%). The following associated comorbidities: perinatal hypoxia, low weight at birth, behavioral abnormalities, anxiety, auto- and heteroaggressivity, language disorders, hiperphagia, learning and memory deficit, hearing disorders, mainly hiperacusia, Social isolation, cognitive deficit, sleeping disorders and parenteral abuse of child. Some non-nervous system comorbidities, such as pulmonary diseases and allergic reactions also were found. Some locomotor abnormalities as genus valgo and flat feet were also observed. The mothers exhibited the followings diseases during pregnancy: urinary infections, behavioral disturbances like anxiety, fobias, hyperactivity, toxoplasmosis and Zika virus infections, hyperemesis, oligohydramnios and lost of amniotic fluid, twin pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, aging placenta, cesarean, high blood pressure, maternal sepsis, diabetes, hepatic coma, hipotiroidism, viral hepatitis, parent obesity, and social problems, such as excessive work, low economy and poor social conditions, environmental contamination and labor and conjugal stress. We emphasized different phenotype subtypes of ASD related with the environmental changes of developing countries and the multiple maternal pathology as risks factor for ASD.

    In the present review we made a neuroscience approach to the study of ASD describing the following hypothesis and theories based on clinical data in an attempt to explain the complex physiopathology of the autistic brain.

    The Hypothesis of Abnormal Neuron and Glial Cell Migration During Development

    A large amount of evidence suggests that pathological processes taking place in early embryonic neurodevelopment might be responsible for later manifestation of autistic symptoms. This dysfunctional development includes altered maturation/differentiation processes, disturbances in cell-cell communication, and an unbalanced ratio between certain neuronal populations. All those processes are highly dependent on the interconnectivity and three-dimensional organizations of the brain 2 (Ilieva et al., 2018). As experimental evidence emerges in recent years, it becomes clear that although there is broad heterogeneity of identified autism risk genes, many of them converge into similar cellular pathways, including those regulating neurite outgrowth, synapse formation and spine stability, and synaptic plasticity. These mechanisms together regulate the structural stability of neurons and are vulnerable targets in ASD 3. Lin et al. (2016)

    Dendritic spines receive a majority of the excitatory synaptic inputs to cortical neurons and are critically involved in synaptic plasticity and learning. Therefore, abnormalities in dendritic spines have long been associated with cognitive dysfunction and neurodevelopmental delay Therefore,abnormalities in dendritic spines have long been associated with cognitive dysfunction and neurodevelopmental delay 4 (Castejón et al., 2004)

    Altered Modular Organization of Structural Cortical Networks

    ASD and ADHD are functional alterations of the cerebral cortex, which present structural anomalies in the arrangement of neurons, in the pattern of connections of cortical columns and in the structure of dendritic spines. These anomalies affect mainly the prefrontal cortex and its connections (ASD and ADHD) are functional alterations of the cerebral cortex, which present structural anomalies in the arrangement of neurons, in the pattern of connections of cortical columns and in the structure of dendritic spines. These alterations affect mainly the prefrontal cortex and its connections. 5. (Martinez-Morga et al., 2018).

    Shi et al. 6 (2013) describedthree modules in autistic children with similar patterns. Compared with controls, autism demonstrates significantly reduced gross network modularity, and a larger number of inter-module connections. However, the autistic brain network demonstrates increased intra- and inter-module connectivity in brain regions including middle frontal gyrus, inferior parietal gyrus, and cingulate, suggesting one underlying compensatory mechanism associated with brain functions of self-reference and episodic memory. This alteration of correlation strength may contribute to the organization alteration of network structures in autistic brains.

    Disrupted Cortical Connectivity Theory and Autism Spectrum Disorders

    This theory suggests that weaker functional connections among brain areas in those with ASD hamper their ability to accomplish complex cognitive and social tasks successfully. These theory support the following hypotheses 1) underconnectivity in ASD is manifested mainly in long-distance cortical as well as subcortical connections rather than in short-distance cortical connections; 2) underconnectivity in ASD is manifested only in complex cognitive and social functions and not in low-level sensory and perceptual tasks; 3) functional underconnectivity in ASD may be the result of underlying anatomical abnormalities, such as problems in the integrity of white matter; 4) the ASD brain adapts to underconnectivity through compensatory strategies such as overconnectivity mainly in frontal and in posterior brain areas 7. (Kana et al., 2011).

    Neuroimaging and electroencephalographic studies have found evidences suggesting that connectivity patterns are altered in ASD. The converging findings of functional connectivity abnormalities and white matter abnormalities in autism suggest that alterations in neural connectivity and the communication between different brain regions may be involved in behavioral and cognitive deficits associated with autism 8. (Palau-Baduell et al., 2012).

    The dominant theory regarding brain connectivity in people with ASD is that there is long distance under-connectivity and local over-connectivity of the frontal cortex. Consistent with this theory, long-range cortico-cortical functional and structural connectivity appears to be weaker in people with ASD than in controls. However, in contrast to the theory, there is less evidence for local over-connectivity of the frontal cortex 9. (Vissers et al., 2012).

    Recent findings of neurological functioning in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) point to altered brain connectivity as a key feature of its pathophysiology. According to the Just et al. 10 the cortical underconnectivity theory of ASD provides an integrated framework for addressing these new findings. This theory suggests that weaker functional connections among brain areas in those with ASD hamper their ability to accomplish complex cognitive and social tasks successfully

    The crucial role played by the disruption of global connectivity in a parallel distributed cortical network, which might result in impairment in integrated cognitive processing, such as impairment in executive function and social cognition. On the other hand, the reduced inter-regional collaboration could lead to a disinhibitory enhancement of neural activity and connectivity in local cortical regions. In addition, enhanced connectivity in the local brain regions is partly due to the abnormal organization of the cortical network as a result of developmental and pathological states. This enhanced local connectivity results in the specialization and facilitation of low-level cognitive processing.

    The disruption of connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and other regions is considered to be a particularly important factor because the prefrontal region shows the most influential inhibitory control on other cortical areas 11 (and Kato, 2008)

    Many functional connectivity studies (fcMRI) have reported underconnectivity in ASD, but results in others have been divergent. Underconnectivity reflects reduced efficiency of within-network communication in ASD, diffusely increased functional connectivity can be attributed to impaired experience-driven mechanisms (e.g., synaptic pruning) 12 (Muller et al., 2011). However, there are notable inconsistencies, with some studies reporting overconnectivity. Improved awareness of their implications appears indispensible in fcMRI studies when inferences about "underconnectivity" or "overconnectivity" in ASD are made 13. (Nair et al.,2014).

    Mohammad-Rezazadeh et al. 14. (2016) also consider that the results of more recent studies do not unanimously support the traditional view in which individuals with ASD have lower connectivity between distant brain regions and increased connectivity within local brain regions. Moreover, further investigations of connectivity with respect to behavior and clinical phenotype are needed to probe underlying brain networks implicated in core deficits of ASD.

    A recent theory attempting to reconcile conflicting results in the literature proposes that hyper-connectivity of brain networks may be more characteristic of young children with ASD, while hypo-connectivity may be more prevalent in adolescents and adults with the disorder when compared to typical development (TD) 15, 16. (Uddin et al., 2013, Nomi and Uddin (2015). Cohorts of individuals with ASD and typical development (TD) individuals demonstrates that functional connectivity atypicalities in the disorder are not uniform across the lifespan.

    According to Abbott et al., (2016) 17, predominant overconnectivity was found at the posterior cingulate seed and right inferior parietal seed, predominant underconnectivity was found for right anterior insula seed and left inferior parietal seed. In the ASD group, reduced integrity was associated with sensory and sociocommunicative symptoms. Atypical connectivity in ASD is network-specific, ranging from extensive overconnectivity to extensive underconnectivity.

    Cauda et al. 18 (2017) distinguished two alteration clusters. Cluster 1, includes the anterior insular, anterior cingulate cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and frontopolar areas, which are parts of the cognitive control system. Cluster 2, presents occipital, temporal, and parietal alteration patterns with the involvement of sensorimotor, premotor, visual, and lingual areas, thus forming a network that is more associated with the auditory-visual, premotor visual somatic functions. In turn, ASD appears to be uniformly distributed in the two clusters.

    Carper et al. 19 (2015) analyzed the corticospinal tract anatomy and functional connectivity of primary motor cortex in autism and postulated that their findings, implicating both functional and anatomical connectivity of the primary motor cortex, suggest that network anomalies in ASD go well beyond sociocommunicative domains, affecting basic motor execution. They also suggested that even in right-handed adolescents with ASD, typical left hemisphere dominance is reduced, both anatomically and functionally, with an unusual degree of right hemisphere motor participation.

    Melillo and Leisman 20 (2009) conceptualize that if the problem of autistic spectrum disorder is primarily one of desynchronization and ineffective interhemispheric communication, then the best way to address the symptoms is to improve coordination between areas of the brain. To do that the best approach would include multimodal therapeusis that would include a combination of somatosensory, cognitive, behavioral, and biochemical interventions all directed at improving overall health, reducing inflammation and increasing right hemisphere activity to the level that it becomes temporally coherent with the left hemisphere. They hypothesize that the unilateral increased hemispheric stimulation has the effect of increasing the temporal oscillations within the thalamocortical pathways bringing it closer to the oscillation rate of the adequately functioning hemisphere.

    Recent brain neuroimaging studies point to anatomic and functional abnormalities of the superior temporal lobe in autistic children 21. (Golseand Robel, 2009). The superior temporal lobe is currently at the focus of intensive research in infantile autism, a psychopathologic disorder apparently representing the severest failure of access to intersubjectivity, i.e. the ability to accept that others exist independently of oneself. Access to intersubjectivity seems to involve the superior temporal lobe, which is the seat of several relevant functions such as face and voice recognition and perception of others' movements, and coordinates the different sensory inputs that identify an object as being "external".

    According to Levy 22 (2007) when the developing brain encounters constrained connectivity, it evolves an abnormal organization, the features of which may be best explained by a developmental failure of neural connectivity, where high local connectivity develops in tandem with low long-range connectivity, resulting in constricted repetitive behaviors.

    The Hypothesis of Mirror Neuron Networks in Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Adolescents with ASD showed atypically increased functional connectivity involving the mentalizing and mirror neuron systems, largely reflecting greater cross talk between the 2. This finding is consistent with emerging evidence of reduced network segregation in ASD and challenges the prevailing theory of general long-distance underconnectivity in ASD. This excess ToM-MNS connectivity may reflect immature or aberrant developmental processes in 2 brain networks involved in understanding of others, a domain of impairment in ASD. Further, robust links with sociocommunicative symptoms of ASD implicate atypically increased ToM-MNS connectivity in social deficits observed in ASD 23 (Fishman et al.,2014).

    It seems possible that different sub-populations of mirror neurons, located in several regions, contribute differentially to social cognitive functions. It is hypothesized that mirror neuron coding for action-direction may be required for developing attentional sensitivity to self-directed actions, and consequently for person-oriented, stimulus-driven attention. Mirror neuron networks may vary for different types of social learning such as "automatic" imitation and imitation learning 24. (Williams, 2008).

    Oberman and Ramachandran 25.(2007) studied the role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders and propose that internal simulation mechanisms, such as the mirror neuron system, are necessary for normal development of recognition, imitation, theory of mind, empathy, and language. Additionally, the authors suggest that dysfunctional simulation mechanisms may underlie the social and communicative deficits seen in individuals with autism spectrum disorders.

    The Hypothesis on Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and ASD.

    Insell et al. 26 (1999) reviewed evidence from animal studies demonstrating that the nonapeptides, oxytocin and vasopressin, have unique effects on the normal expression of species-typical social behavior, communication, and rituals. Based on this evidence, they hypothesize that an abnormality in oxytocin or vasopressin neurotransmission may account for several features of autism. As autism appears to be a genetic disorder, mutations in the various peptide, peptide receptor, or lineage-specific developmental genes could lead to altered oxytocin or vasopressin neurotransmission.

    The Hypothesis of Neurogenesis in the Amygdala as a Contributing Cause of Autism

    Since the childhood psychiatric condition of autism involves deficits in "social intelligence", it is plausible that autism may be caused by an amygdala abnormality. The amygdala is therefore proposed to be one of several neural regions that are abnormal in autism 27 (Baron-Cohen et al., 2000).Several studies have associated the amygdala to the autism. This key structure is a complex cerebral region which has been associated with social behaviors and the emotional significance of the daily experiences. It is known that new neurons are not well responsive to GABA stimulation, allowing the long-term potentiation necessary for the learning process. Based on these evidence it is tantalizing to hypothesize that the sociability impairment seen in some individuals with autism may partly be assigned to impaired regulation of the GABAergic system and to the impact of this impairment on the adequate functioning of the amygdala and on its capacity to store new experiences and to modulate the plasticity of the corticostriatal connections 28. (Mercadante et al.,2008). The key brain structures that have been implicated in the social cognition deficits in autism are: (1) the amygdala, (2) the superior temporal sulcus region, and (3) the fusiform gyrus 29. (Pelphrey K et al., 2004).

    According to Amaral 30, 31 recent data from studies in our laboratory on the effects of amygdala lesions in the macaque monkey are at variance with a fundamental role for the amygdala in social behaviour. If the amygdala is not essential for normal social behaviour, as seems to be the case in both non-human primates and selected patients with bilateral amygdala damage, then it is unlikely to be the substrate for the abnormal social behaviour of autism. However, damage to the amygdala does have an effect on a monkey's response to normally fear-inducing stimuli, such as snakes, and removes a natural reluctance to engage novel conspecifics in social interactions. These findings lead to the conclusion that an important role for the amygdala is in the detection of threats and mobilizing an appropriate behavioural response, part of which is fear. If the amygdala is pathological in subjects with autism, it may contribute to their abnormal fears and increased anxiety rather than their abnormal social behavior.

    Theory of Immune Dysfunction on ASD

    Dysregulation in immune responses during pregnancy increases the risk of a having a child with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases among pregnant women, and symptoms often worsen during pregnancy 32. (Vogel Ciernia et al., 2018).

    Two main immune dysfunctions in autism are immune regulation involving pro-inflammatory cytokines and autoimmunity. Studies showing elevated brain specific antibodies in autism support an autoimmune mechanism. Viruses may initiate the process but the subsequent activation of cytokines is the damaging factor associated with autism. Virus specific antibodies associated with measles virus have been demonstrated in autistic subjects. Maternal antibodies may trigger autism as a mechanism of autoimmunity. MMR vaccination may increase risk for autism via an autoimmune mechanism in autism 33. (Cohly and Panja, 2005).

    Epidemiological studies have shown a relationship with maternal immune disturbances during pregnancy and ASD. Moreover, decades of research have identified numerous systemic and cellular immune abnormalities in individuals with ASD and their families. These include changes in immune cell number, differences in cytokine and chemokine production, and alterations of cellular function at rest and in response to immunological challenge. Many of these changes in immune responses are associated with increasing impairment in behaviors that are core features of ASD 34, 35, 36. (Careaga and Ashwood, .2012, Hsiao, 2013, Noriega and Savelkoul, 2014). Individuals diagnosed with ASD have alterations in immune cells such as T cells, B cells, monocytes, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells. Also, many individuals diagnosed with ASD have alterations in immunoglobulins and increased autoantibodies. Finally, an important portion of individuals diagnosed with ASD has elevated peripheral cytokines and chemokines and associated neuroinflammation 37 (Bjorklund et al., 2016). Scientific research studies emerging within the past two decades suggest that immune dysfunction and inflammation have pathogenic influences through different mechanisms, all leading to both a chronic state of low grade inflammation, and alterations in the central nervous system and immune response, respectively 38. (Dipasquale et al., 2017). Neuro-inflammation and neuro-immune abnormalities have now been established in ASD as key factors in its development and maintenance 39 (Siniscalco et al., 2018). Inflammation in the brain and CNS has been reported by several groups with notable microglia activation and increased cytokine production in postmortem brain specimens of young and old individuals with ASD 40 (Gesundheit et al., 2013).

    The Theory on the Genetic Architecture of ASD

    The genetic architecture of ASD has become increasingly clear and increasingly complex with estimates of at least 1000 genetic alterations associated with the risk for ASD 41. (Beversdorf, 2016). In the last 10 years, there have been significant advances in understanding the genetic basis for ASD, critically supported through the establishment of ASD bio-collections and application in research. Collectively, these include mapping ASD candidate genes, assessing the nature and frequency of gene mutations and their association with ASD clinical subgroups, insights into related molecular pathways such as the synapses, chromatin remodelling, transcription and ASD-related brain regions 42. Reilly et al. 2017. Multiple lines of evidence from genetic linkage studies to animal models implicate aberrant cortical plasticity and metaplasticity in the pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and fragile X syndrome (FXS) 43. (Oberman et al., 2016).

    Data from whole-genome screens in multiplex families suggest interactions of at least 10 genes in the causation of autism. Thus far, a putative speech and language region at 7q31-q33 seems most strongly linked to autism, with linkages to multiple other loci under investigation. Cytogenetic abnormalities at the 15q11-q13 locus are fairly frequent in people with autism, and a "chromosome 15 phenotype" was described in individuals with chromosome 15 duplications. Among other candidate genes are the FOXP2, RAY1/ST7, IMMP2L, and RELN genes at 7q22-q33 and the GABA(A) receptor subunit and UBE3A genes on chromosome 15q11-q13.44. (Muhle et al.,2004).

    Prior structural MRI studies demonstrated atypical gray matter characteristics in siblings of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, they did not clarify which aspect of gray matter is related to the endophenotype (i.e. genetic vulnerability) of ASD. This proof-of-concept study suggests that an ASD endophenotype emerges in sulcal depth SD and that neural bases for ASD diagnosis can be discerned from the endophenotype when accounted for the difference between TD siblings. 45. (Yamagata et al., 2019).

    The Hypothesis of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Children with ASD

    The different clinical symptoms found in ASD patients as observed in the present study suggest the dysfunction of a cell energy organelle as mitochondria. Rose et al. 46. (2018) systematically review the literature on human studies of mitochondrial dysfunction related to ASD. Clinical aspects of mitochondrial dysfunction in ASD include unusual neurodevelopmental regression, especially if triggered by an inflammatory event, gastrointestinal symptoms, seizures, motor delays, fatigue and lethargy.

    Recent researches have revealed the influence of mitochondrial physiology on the development of ASD. Several research groups have identified defects in respiratory complexes, coenzyme-Q10 deficiency, increased oxidative damage, decreased of superoxide dismutase (SOD2). A study on the influence of mitochondrial physiology on the development of ASD can provide new alternatives and challenges. The increment of mitochondrial DNA, high oxidative stress, and high expression of the MFN2 gene could help as a scanner of the mitochondrial function in children with ASD 47. (Carrasco et al., 2019).

    The Dopamine Hypothesis of ASD

    Pavăl (2017) 48 has proposed a dopamine hypothesis of autism spectrum disorder postulating that autistic behavior arises from dysfunctions in the midbrain dopaminergic system and that a dysfunction of the mesocorticolimbic circuit leads to social deficits, while a dysfunction of the nigrostriatal circuit leads to stereotyped behaviors. This hypothesis is based clinical studies of dopamine antagonists which seem to have improving effects on autistic behavior

    The Hypothesis on Synaptopathology in ASD

    Multiple studies have revealed that mutations in genes like NRXN, NLGNSHANKTSC1/2FMR1, and MECP2 converge on common cellular pathways that intersect at synapses. These genes encode cell adhesion molecules, scaffolding proteins and proteins involved in synaptic transcription, protein synthesis and degradation, affecting various aspects of synapses including synapse formation and elimination, synaptic transmission and plasticity. This suggests that the pathogenesis of ASD may, at least in part, be attributed to synaptic dysfunction 49. (Guang et al., 2018). Most ASD genes are implicated in neurogenesis, structural maturation, synaptogenesis and function 50. (Gilbert and Man, 2017). SHANK3 is a synaptic scaffolding protein localized in the postsynaptic density and has a crucial role in synaptogenesis and neural physiology. Deletions and point mutations in SHANK3 cause Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS), and have also been implicated in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disabilities, leading to the hypothesis that reduced SHANK3 expression impairs basic brain functions that are important for social communication and cognition.

    Maussion et al. 51 (2019) found an increased expression of BDNF mRNA in the frontal cortex of autistic patients based on a candidate genes approach. The Authors present the expression data of 4 transcripts of interest (BDNF, CAMK2a, NR-CAM and RIMS1) located at the synapse in two regions of interest in the context of the ASDs; the lobule VI of cerebellum and the Brodmann area 46.

    'Theory of Mind' and the Contribution to ASD

    The ability to attribute mental states to others ('theory of mind') pervades normal social interaction and is impaired in autistic individuals. The Happé studies in Asperger syndrome (1996) 52 suggest that a highly circumscribed region of left medial prefrontal cortex is a crucial component of the brain system that underlies the normal understanding of other minds. Experimental evidence shows that the inability to attribute mental states, such as desires and beliefs, to self and others (mentalizing) explains the social and communication impairments of individuals with autism. Brain imaging studies in normal volunteers highlight a circumscribed network that is active during mentalizing and links medial prefrontal regions with posterior superior temporal sulcus and temporal poles. The brain abnormality that results in mentalizing failure in autism may involve weak connections between components of this system 53. (Frith, 2001). Specifically, the ability to decode others' mental states from observable cues (such as facial expressions) may rely on contributions from the orbitofrontal/medial temporal circuit within the right hemisphere. In contrast, the ability to reason about others' mental states may rely left medial frontal regions. We conclude by reviewing evidence suggesting that the developmental roots of autism might lie in abnormal functioning of the orbitofrontal/medial temporal circuit which may, in turn, underlie the abnormal development of social-cognitive skills among individuals with autism 54. (Sabbagh, 2004).

    The Theory Contribution of Cerebellum to ASD

    During the past decades results from neuroanatomical, neuroimaging and clinical studies have substantially extended the functional role of the cerebellum in a variety of cognitive processes, such as executive functioning, memory, learning, attention, visuo-spatial regulation, language and behavioral-affective modulation to cognitive and affective regulation 55, 56. (Barrios and  Guàrdia, 2001, Baillieux et al., 2008).

    A special focus of recent research have been made on the striatum and the cerebellum, two structures known not only to control movement but also to be involved in cognitive functions such as memory and language. Dysfunction within the motor system may be associated with abnormal movements in ASD that are translated into ataxia, abnormal pattern of righting, gait sequencing, development of walking, and hand positioning, There is evidence that the frontostriatal motor system and/or the cerebellar motor systems may be the site of dysfunction in ASD. Indeed, the cerebellum seems to be essential in the development of basic social capabilities, communication, repetitive/restrictive behaviors, and motor and cognitive behaviors that are all impaired in ASD. Cerebellar neuropathology including cerebellar hypoplasia and reduced cerebellar Purkinje cell numbers are the most consistent neuropathologies linked to ASD 57, 58.( Fucillo,2016, Jaber 2017,)

    Disruptions in specific cerebro-cerebellar loops in ASD might impede the specialization of cortical regions involved in motor control, language, and social interaction, leading to impairments in these domains. Consistent with this concept, structural, and functional differences in sensorimotor regions of the cerebellum and sensorimotor cerebro-cerebellar circuits are associated with deficits in motor control and increased repetitive and stereotyped behaviors in ASD. Communication and social impairments are associated with atypical activation and structure in cerebro-cerebellar loops underpinning language and social cognition. Finally, there is converging evidence from structural, functional, and connectivity neuroimaging studies that cerebellar right Crus I/II abnormalities are related to more severe ASD impairments in all domains 59, 60 ( D'Mello and Stoodley 2015, D'Mello et al., 2015). Differences in cerebellar development and/or early cerebellar damage could impact a wide range of behaviors via the closed-loop circuits connecting the cerebellum with multiple cerebral cortical regions. Based on these anatomical circuits, behavioral outcomes should depend on which cerebro-cerebellar circuits are affected.61, 62, 63, 64 (Becker and Stoodley 2013,.Stoodley, 2014, 2016, Stoodley et al., 2017),

    Postmortem studies have revealed neuropathological abnormalities in cerebellar cellular architecture while studies on mouse lines with cell loss or mutations in single genes restricted to cerebellar Purkinje cells have also strongly implicated this brain structure in contributing to the autistic phenotype 65. (Hampson and Blatt, 2015).

    One major component that appears highly impacted in autism is the GABAergic system. It is now apparent that there are widespread significant effects in many distributed regions in the autism brain revealed by histochemical, autoradiographic, and biochemical studies. The key synthesizing enzymes for GABA, glutamic acid decarboxylase type 65 and 67 (GAD65 and GAD67), are decreased in the cerebellum and closer examination of mRNA levels revealed that it is largely due to decreases in Purkinje cells and a subpopulation of larger dentate neurons as measured by in situ hybridization studies. Other cell types had either normal GAD levels (Golgi cells, smaller dentate interneurons, and stellate cells) or increased levels (basket cells). GABA receptor density, number, and protein expression are all decreased in the cerebellum and in select cortical areas. These Authors suggest suggests a disturbance in the intrinsic cerebellar circuitry in the autism group potentially interfering with the synchronous firing of inferior olivary neurons, and the timing of Purkinje cell firing and inputs to the dentate nuclei. Disturbances in critical neural substrates within these key circuits could disrupt afferents to motor and/or cognitive cerebral association areas in the autistic brain likely contributing to the marked behavioral consequences characteristic of autism. Taken together, data from these studies suggest that there is a marked dysregulation of the inhibitory GABA system in the autism brain affecting particular biomarkers localized to specific cell types and lamina likely influencing circuitry and behavior 66, 67, 68. (Yip J (2007), Soghomonianand Blatt, 2007, Yip et al, (2009) and Blatt and Fatemi.(2011).


    According to the results of our laboratory the theory of immune dysfunction, the theory on the genetic architecture of ASD, the disrupted cortical connectivity theory and the theory on the contribution of cerebellum to ASD have shown fundamental experimental evidences to support the core symptoms of the complex and enigmatic autism spectrum disorder. The hypothesis above described are stimulating and interesting approaches that deserve further systematic basic and clinical neuroscience research.


    This review has been carried out by the logistic support of Biological Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Zulia University, San Rafael Home Clinic and Castejon Foundation.


    1.Castejón O J, Galindez P, Villasmil A, Torres I A, Grundbaum E et al. (2019) Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in a developing country. A clinical and descriptive study of 75 infant and young patients. , Biomed J. Scientific and Tech Res 19(4), 1-19.
    2.IlievaM FexSvenningsenÅ, Thorsen M. (2018) Michel TM.Psychiatry in a dish: stem cells and brain organoids modeling autism spectrum disorders.Biol Psychiatry. 83(7), 558-568.
    3.Lin Y C, Frei J A, Shen W KilanderMB, Blatt G J. (2016) . , A Subset of Autism-Associated Genes Regulate the Structural Stability of Neurons.Front. CellNeurosci 10, 263.
    4.O J Castejón, Castellano A, Arismendi G. (2004) Transmission electron microscopy study of cortical dendritic spines in the human oedematous cerebral cortex. , J. Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology (Italy) 36, 181-191.
    5.Martinez-Morga M, Quesada-Rico M P, Bueno C, Martinez S. (2018) Neurobiological bases of autistic spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: neural differentiation and synaptogenesis.Rev Neurol. 66(01), 97-102.
    6.Shi F, Wang L, Peng Z, Wee C Y, Shen D. (2013) Altered modular organization of structural cortical networks in children with autism.PLoSOne. 8(5), 1-11.
    7.Kana R K, Libero L E, Moore M S.Disrupted cortical connectivity theory as an explanatory model for autism spectrum disorders.Phys Life Rev. 8(4), 410-437.
    8.Palau-BaduellM Salvadó-SalvadóB, Clofent-TorrentóM Valls-SantasusanaA.Autism and neural connectivity.Rev Neurol. 2012; 54 (Suppl.) 1:S31-39.[9].VissersME, Cohen MX, GeurtsHM. Brain connectivity and high functioning autism: a promising path of research that needs refined models, methodological convergence, and stronger behavioral links.Neurosci.Biobehav. , Rev 36(1), 604-625.
    9.Just M A, Kellar T A, Adam M, Timothy J A, Keller A. (2013) A Theory of autism based on frontal-posterior underconnectivity. In MA Just & Pelphprey KA (Eds.), Development and Brain System in Autism , New York 35-63.
    10.Kato M TakahataK. (2008) Neural mechanism underlying autistic savant and acquired savant syndrome.Brain Nerve. 60(7), 861-869.
    11.Müller R A, ShihP KeehnB, Leyden KM DeyoeJR, ShuklaDK.Underconnected, but how? A survey of functional connectivity MRI studies in autism spectrum disorders.Cereb. , Cortex 21(10), 2233-43.
    12.Nair A, Keown C L, Shih P DatkoM, Müller RA KeehnB. (2014) Impact of methodological variables on functional connectivity findings in autism spectrum disorders.Hum. Brain Mapp. 35(8), 4035-4048.
    13.Mohammad-Rezazadeh I, Frohlich J, Loo S K, JesteSS.Brain connectivity in autism spectrum disorder.Curr.Opin. , Neurol 29(2), 137-147.
    14.Uddin L Q, Lynch CJ SupekarK, Phillips J KhouzamA, Feinstein C, Menon V RyaliS. (2013) Salience network-based classification and prediction of symptom severity in children with autism.JAMA Psychiatry. 70(8), 869-879.
    15.Nomi J S, Uddin L Q. (2015) Developmental changes in large-scale network connectivity in autism.Neuroimage Clin. 7, 732-741.
    16.Abbott A E, Nair A, Keown C L, DatkoM JahediA, Fishman I et al.Patterns of atypical functional connectivity and behavioral links in autism differ between default, salience, and executive networks.Cereb. , Cortex 26(10), 4034-4045.
    17.Cauda F, Nani A, Costa T, Palermo S, TatuK ManuelloJ et al. (2018) The morphometric co-atrophy networking of schizophrenia, autistic and obsessive spectrum disorders.Hum. Brain Mapp. 39(5), 1898-1928.
    18.Carper R A, Solders S, Fishman I TreiberJM, Müller R A. (2015) Corticospinal tract anatomy and functional connectivity of primary motor cortex in autism.J AmAcadChildAdolescPsychiatry. 54(10), 859-867.
    19.Melillo R, LeismanG. (2009) Autistic spectrum disorders as functional disconnection syndrome.RevNeurosci. 20(2), 111-131.
    20.Robel L GolseB. (2009) Towards an integrated approach to infantile autism: the superior temporal lobe between neurosciences and psychoanalysisBullAcad. , Natl. Med 193(2), 307-313.
    21.Levy F. (2007) Theories of autism.Aust. , N. Z. J. Psychiatry 41(11), 859-68.
    22.Fishman I, Keown C L, Lincoln A J, Pineda J A, Müller R A.Atypical cross talk between mentalizing and mirror neuron networks in autism spectrum disorder.JAMA Psychiatry. 71(7), 751-760.
    23.Williams J H.Self-other relations in social development and autism: multiple roles for mirror neurons and other brain bases.Autism Res.2008;. 1(2), 73-90.
    24.Ramachandran VS ObermanLM. (2007) The simulating social mind: the role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. 133(2), 310-327.
    25.O'Brien DJ InselTR, LeckmanJF. (1999) Oxytocin, vasopressin, and autism: is there a connection?Biol Psychiatry. 45(2), 145-57.
    26.Baron-Cohen S, Ring H A, Wheelwright S BullmoreET, Ashwin C, Williams S C..
    27.The amygdala theory of autism.Neurosci.Biobehav. , Rev 24(3), 355-364.
    28.Mercadante MT CysneirosRM, Schwartzman J S, AridaRM. (2008) CavalheiroEA, Scorza FA. Neurogenesis in the amygdala: a new etiologic hypothesis of autism?.Med. Hypotheses. 70(2), 352-357.
    29.PelphreyKK AdolphsR, Morris J P.Neuroanatomical substrates of social cognition dysfunction in autism.Ment. , Retard. Dev.Disabil. Res. Rev 10(4), 259-271.
    30.Amaral D G, Corbett B A. (2003) The amygdala, autism and anxiety. , Novartis Found, Symp 251, 177-187.
    31.Amaral D G, Bauman M D. (2003) SchumannCM.The amygdala and autism: implications from non-human primate studies.Genes BrainBehav. 2(5), 295-302.
    32.VogelCierniaA CareagaM, LaSalle J M, Ashwood P. (2018) Microglia from offspring of dams with allergic asthma exhibit epigenomic alterations in genes dysregulated in autism.Glia. 66(3), 505-521.
    33.CohlyHH PanjaA. (2005) Immunological findings in autism.Int. , Rev.Neurobiol 71, 317-341.
    34.Ashwood P CareagaM. (2012) Autism spectrum disorders: from immunity to behavior.Methods Mol. , Biol 934, 219-240.
    35.Hsiao E Y. (2013) Immune dysregulation in autism spectrum disorder.Int. , Rev.Neurobiol 113, 269-302.
    36.Noriega D B, Savelkoul H F. (2014) Immune dysregulation in autism spectrum disorder.Eur. , J.Pediatr 173(1), 33-43.
    37.Bjorklund G, Saad K, Chirumbolo S, Kern J K, Geier D A et al.Urbina MA.Immune dysfunction and neuroinflammation in autism spectrum disorder.ActaNeurobiol. , Exp. (Wars) 76(4), 257-268.
    38.DipasqualeV CutrupiMC, Manti S ColavitaL, CuppariC SalpietroC. (2017) . Neuroinflammation in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Role of High Mobility Group Box1 Protein.IntJ Mol Cell Med,6(3): 148-55.
    39.Siniscalco D, Schultz S, Brigida A L, Antonucci N. (2018) Inflammation and neuro-immune dysregulations in autism spectrum disorders.Pharmaceuticals. (Basel).56 11(2), 1-14.
    40.Rosenzweig JP GesundheitB, NaorD LererB, ZachorDA ProcházkaV, MelamedM KristtDA, Steinberg A et al. (2013) Immunological and autoimmune considerations of autism spectrum disorders.J.Autoimmun. 44, 1-7.
    41.BeversdorfDQ. (2016) Missouri Autism Summit Consortium. Phenotyping, etiological factors, and biomarkers: toward precision medicine in autism spectrum disorders.J. Dev.Behav.Pediatr. 37(8), 659-673.
    42.ReillyJ GallagherL, ChenJL LeaderG, ShenS. (2017) Bio-collections in autism research.Mol. , Autism 8(34), 1-36.
    43.ObermanLM FritzIfert-MillerF, Shahid BashirS NajibU, Gonzalez-HeydrichJ.Jonathan PickerJ,RotenbergA,Pascual-LeoneA.(2016). Abnormal mechanisms of plasticity and metaplasticity in autism spectrum disorders and fragile x syndrome.J. , ChildAdolesc.Psychopharmacol 26(7), 617-624.
    44.MuhleR TrentacosteSV.RapinI. The genetics of autism.Pediatrics.2004;. 113(5), 472-486.
    45.Yamagata B, ItahashiT FujinoJ, OhtaH TakashioO, Nakamura M, Kato N et al. (2019) Cortical surface architecture endophenotype and correlates of clinical diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.Psychiatry Clin.Neurosci.73(7):. 409-415.
    46.RoseS NiyazovDM, RossignolDA GoldenthalM, KahlerSG FryeRE. (2018) Clinical and molecular characteristics of mitochondrial dysfunction in autism spectrum disorder.Mol. , Diagn.Ther 22(5), 571-593.
    47.Carrasco M, Salazar C, Tiznado W, Ruiz L M. (2019) Alterations of mitochondrial biology in the oral mucosa of chilean children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Cells.8(4):. 1-18.
    48.PavălDA. (2017) Dopamine hypothesis of autism spectrum disorder.DevNeurosci,39(5):. 355-360.
    49.Pang N GuangS, Deng X, Yang L, He F, Wu L et al. (2018) . Synaptopathology Involved in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Front. Cell.Neurosci 12(470), 1-16.
    50.Gilbert J, Man.HY.(2017). Fundamental Elements in Autism: From Neurogenesis and Neurite Growth to Synaptic Plasticity.Front. , Cell.Neurosci 11(359), 1-25.
    51.MaussionG MoalicJM, SimonneauM GorwoodP, RamozN. (2019) Increased expression of BDNF mRNA in the frontal cortex of autistic patients.Behav. , Brain Res 359, 903-909.
    52.Ehlers S HappéF, Fletcher P, Johansson M FrithU, Dolan R GillbergC, FrackowiakR FrithC. (1996) Dec20, Theory of mind' in the brain. Evidence from a PET scan study of Asperger syndrome.Neuroreport. 8(1), 197-201.
    53.FrithU.Mind blindness and the brain in autism.Neuron.2001 ;32(6):. 969-979.
    54.Sabbagh M A.Understanding orbitofrontal contributions to theory-of-mind reasoning: implications for autism.Brain Cogn..2004;. 55(1), 209-19.
    55.Barrios M, GuàrdiaJ. (2001) Relation of the cerebellum with cognitive function: neuroanatomical, clinical and neuroimaging evidence.Rev Neurol. 33(6), 582-591.
    56.BaillieuxH DeSmetHJ, PaquierPF DeDeynPP, MariënP.Cerebellar neurocognition: insights into the bottom of the brain.Clin. , Neurol.Neurosurg 110(8), 763-773.
    57. (2017) Jaber M.The cerebellum as a major player in motor disturbances related to Autistic Syndrome Disorders.Encephale. 43(2), 170-175.
    58.FuccilloMV. (2016) Striatal circuits as a common node for autism pathophysiology.Front.Neurosci. 10(27), 1-19.
    59.D'MelloAM StoodleyCJ. (2015) Cerebro-cerebellar circuits in autism spectrum disorder.FrontNeurosci. 9(408), 1-18.
    60.D'MelloAM CrocettiD, MostofskySH StoodleyCJ. (2015) Cerebellar gray matter and lobular volumes correlate with core autism symptoms.Neuroimage Clin. 7, 631-639.
    61.Becker E B, StoodleyCJ. (2013) Autism spectrum disorder and the cerebellum.Int. , Rev.Neurobiol 113, 1-34.
    62.StoodleyCJ. (2014) Distinct regions of the cerebellum show gray matter decreases in autism, ADHD, and developmental dyslexia.Front. , SystNeurosci 8(92), 1-17.
    63.StoodleyCJ. (2016) The cerebellum and neurodevelopmental disorders.Cerebellum. 15(1), 34-37.
    64.StoodleyCJ D'MelloAM, EllegoodJ JakkamsettiV, Liu P, Nebel M B, Gibson J M et al. (2017) Altered cerebellar connectivity in autism and cerebellar-mediated rescue of autism-related behaviors in. 20(12), 1744-1751.
    65.Hampson D R, Blatt G J. (2015) Autism spectrum disorders and neuropathology of the cerebellum.Front.Neurosci. 9, 420-10.
    66.Yip J, Blatt GJ SoghomonianJJ. (2007) Decreased GAD67 mRNA levels in cerebellar Purkinje cells in autism: pathophysiological implications.ActaNeuropathol. 113(5), 559-568.
    67.YipJ SoghomonianJJ, Blatt G J. (2009) Decreased GAD65 mRNA levels in select subpopulations of neurons in the cerebellar dentate nuclei in autism: an in situ hybridization study.Autism Res. 2(1), 50-59.
    68.Blatt G J, FatemiSH. (2011) Alterations in GABAergic biomarkers in the autism brain: research findings and clinical implications.AnatRec (Hoboken). 294(10), 1646-1652.

    Cited by (1)

    1.Goldby Miriam, Keller Anat, 2010, The Commission's proposal for a new European Systemic Risk Board: an evaluation, Law and Financial Markets Review, 4(1), 48, 10.1080/17521440.2010.11428100