As healthcare markets have become more dynamic and turbulent, healthcare organizations have evolved by becoming increasingly “Smart-Agile” in their business practices. Smart-Agility definition-ally ensures success due to its inherent ability to rapidly detect and react appropriately to varied and evolving unclear, complex, and seemingly tumultuous situations and produce high-quality, low-cost goods and services with high customer satisfaction. Thus, there is a vital need for Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems for collection, analyses, and reporting of substantial quantities of healthcare data to inform patient treatment and organizational decisions. EPIC® and its meaningful-use components appear increasingly popular, capturing a majority portion of the healthcare Electronic Healthcare Records (EHR) IT market (>~30%).Yet, there are few, if any, studies reporting on EPIC in terms of Smart-Agility.
Aim
The intent of this article is to report a systematic review of scientific literature regarding EPIC’s healthcare IT systems meaningful-use features cross-compared with Smart-Agility aspects to produce a positive vs. negative report card—and whether its features are critical vs. non-critical in terms of Smart-Agility.
Method
Findings reported herein derive from a grounded, iterative review of open-source, peer-reviewed scientific literature following PRISMA.
Findings
Report card results were mixed. EPIC clearly succeeds and excels (better than average) on Smart-Agile healthcare IT system core aspects that are the most central, critical and valuable in terms of informing healthcare organizations’ decisions and their patients’ care (6 out of 7; B+, -A), specifically: Standardized Data Collection / Connectivity, Real-Time Data Warehousing/Outcome Measures, Enhanced Patient Safety, Patient Tracking and Follow-up (Continuity of Care), Patient Involvement, and Potential Use in Medical Education. The only critical core criterion it failed on was End-User Satisfaction, and some of that appears to dissipate with new users’ software familiarity.
Conclusion
EPIC provides a solid and relatively inexpensive foundation with great potential for enabling Smart Agility in healthcare organizations with its high-quality collection and management of vast amounts of inter-connected raw data, auto-analysis, and fast report generation. But it does so with hidden costs and inefficiencies. Avenues of further inquiry are suggested.
AgilityElectronic Health RecordsEHR systemsEPICHealthcare Information TechnologyMeaningful UseBackground
As current healthcare business environments become increasingly dynamic and turbulent 123, many organizations have adapted successfully by adopting a concept of “agility” into their processes. 1245678. Although the concept of agility originally derived from the manufacturing sector 39, it has been increasingly transferred and incorporated throughout modern enterprises in general, especially the field of healthcare 1011. Simply defined, agility means rapidly responding to changing market conditions in order to acquire a position to take advantage and optimize opportunities 1412131415. Agility eponymously ensures the probability of successful operations by virtue of its ability to quickly detect and respond to any given situation. 161718192021 Agility also means continuous quality improvement by encouraging market-performance alignment within organizational strategic objectives. 1 The challenge arises out of extensive and varied operations in uncertain, complex, ambiguous, dynamic, and turbulent conditions 1. Agile organizations are considered able to swiftly discern and conceive high-quality, low-cost, and high customer satisfaction-providing products, services, and solutions delivered within short suspense deadlines. 1 This highlights the need for information technology and systems for detection of intra-organization and external market characteristics and performance criteria in healthcare organizations. This requires large quantities of data and the infrastructure to collect and analyze it accurately and efficiently. 15222324
There have been specific Information Technology (IT) tools developed to enable organizations responsiveness to market changes, particularly in the healthcare industries, that have been studied in terms of their efficaciousness 162526. Also, for healthcare organizations, there are certified off-the-shelf, on-the-spot, one-resource electronic records (EHR) software systems that have become popular choices. This is due to federal and state mandates and incentives for the adoption of “meaningful use” software that offer varying potential to inform and promote Smart-Agile patient medical treatment and organizational decisions.272829303132333435 For most healthcare organizations caught in the rub, the sensible choice has been EPIC ®36, which has recently (circa 2019) and rapidly garnered well over 30% of the EHR market share and is seeking substantially more shares in other electronic records markets (e.g., academic, legal, human resources).3738 Therefore, it is only sensible to conduct a systematic review and evaluation of EPIC’s meaningful use features in accordance with their relevance to smart enabling of healthcare organizations’ agility, including: standardized data collection, technological somnambulism, time commitments and productivity, real-time data warehousing and (patient-centered) efficient production of outcome measures, enhanced patient safety, patient tracking and follow-up, end-user satisfaction, reminders, patient involvement, and potential use in medical education / training 38. Yet, despite EPIC’s preeminence in healthcare IT, there are few, if any, such appraisals on its contributions to Smart-Agility. Therefore, the intent of this article is to report a systematic and comprehensive review and assessment of EPIC’s meaningful use features compared against what is termed aspects of Smart-Agile IT healthcare systems 101139 the ultimate aim of this work being the provision of a Smart-Agile report card for EPIC. Note, this is a review of EPIC only and only in terms of its meaningful use features cross-compared with Smart-Agility. EPIC is in no way considered representative of any other or all meaningful use EHR software, though in terms of other software being meaningful use EPIC may be reflective of those software(s). EPIC’s examination here is justified in that it is currently the most popular and ubiquitous EHR software according to market share.
Method
The findings in this article derive from a 5-phased systematic, iterative “theoretic grounded” 404142 literature review on EPIC in terms of the Smart-Agility that is depicted in Figure 1.
“Grounded” Literature Review
(Figure 1) depicts the PRISMA evidence-based and best practices literature review research process that informed the work reported herein. Open-source peer-reviewed articles from multiple sources were identified and reviewed and conceptual themes generated. This process adhered to general best-practices guidelines and stipulations as per PRISMA 434445 in order to provide a best-practices standard of a high-degree of independence and transparency to the methodological process. Also, following the PRISMA process in terms of a literature review depicted in a PRISMA diagram helps ensure: (1) a depiction of inclusion / exclusion criteria representativeness and comprehensiveness of the literature review; and, (2) exclusion of irrelevant literature (i.e., filler). 434445
Essentially, Figure 1 depicts the steps in this process. Step one involved deriving relevant keywords with which to search for articles and the results from a general canvassing of appropriate peer-reviewed medical/health and open-source subject matter databases, and applying search terms to the databases. Step two was reviewing abstracts or executive summaries for relevance, and retrieving relevant articles. Step three was identification and enumeration of themes and the retrieval of related information for review until all themes were exhausted. Step four was the actual review with a fifth step, which was cross-comparisons against Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems aspects also derived from the literature and reported throughout the Findings. Given that the process is “theoretically grounded” 4041, though the steps are generally sequential and linear, they can be repeated individually or the researcher can cycle back and forth between steps. However, the eventual and ultimate aim was relatively comprehensive literature review that resulted in the identification, summation, and exhaustion of all themes. The one limitation in this method is that not all possible themes in the universe may have been identified. 40 However, this does not suggest that those identified herein are any more or less important or meaningful.
Themes are basic summary statements along with controverted issues (if any) that synthesize whether a meaningful use criteria meets Smart-Agility in terms of nominal presence and absence and backed-up with referenced citations. Note, there is no universal and absolute list of Smart-Agile aspects and these were culled from the Smart-Agility literature too (150). (Nevertheless, Dimirken’s 10 seminal work is about the most comprehensive yet concise inventory.) Also, there was an avoidance of reporting deep delving into controverted issues in the interest of space limitations and avoiding confusion.
The hallmark of Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems and a critical aspect is their ability to “demonstrate unprecedented potential for fast delivery of automated intelligent and sustainable healthcare services,” 103940 which EPIC clearly attains. Smart-Agile health care IT systems also promote coordinated services through auto-connectivity and comparable notes, especially patient notes—an additional Smart-Agility aspect for which EPIC scores high too. EPIC’s potential for providing Smart-Agile healthcare lies in its ability to quickly connect information and retrieve standardized data for comparative analysis and because it requires pre-determined data outcome measurements. 282966, 4647484950515253545556575859606162636465 EPIC is able to generate accurate and timely reports based on requirements for entry of standardized data (e.g., EPIC “hard stops”*) 284866. These can be immediately queried for programmatic evaluation and modification research. Yet, EPIC allows for modification/inclusion of evidence-based prompts and hard stops for identifying and mandating standardized data entry. 48
However, there has been concern about a disadvantage of a monopoly or market dominance that locks purchasers into a monoculture and maintains antiquated programming and retards responsiveness, de-confliction, flexibility, enhancement, and the ability to evolve—antithetical to the very essence of Smart Agility. 284810 Nevertheless, EPIC provides “…the additional software layers for easy access to (standardized) clinical information and serves as an accessible, evaluable platform for collecting and analyzing clinical outcomes….”28 EPIC can be conformed to shepherd data entry and pre-identify errors and error patterns at the moment clinicians enter data. 285152 Thus, data points can be identified and evaluated virtually in real time, almost immediately enhancing accuracy and quality of data as well as informing medical service adjustments. 2860616364, 67686970717273747576777879,
A reported challenge was that EPIC is ill-suited for back-loading data and information in the standard format, which results in multiple and expensive remediation efforts. 4780 Back-loading continues to be a chronic and long-term problem, resulting in maintenance and the attendant expense of supporting several different systems that EPIC was supposed to eliminate in the first place.80 Conversely, EPIC is easily able to capitalize on its standardized real-time workplace data entry of medical-condition-service-for-fee codes to identify patterns and practices.80 It permits non-intrusive, accurate, and virtually real-time identification for analyses that could continuously operate unnoticed in the background.282949515382
EPIC’s standardized data-ready feature can be leveraged to track medical procedures and substantially reduce unplanned outcomes as well as facilitate clinically-based decision support.464781 EPIC’s front-end-back-end standardized data entry, and query and data report generator, have been validated to eliminate the expensive, repetitive loading of data into multiple different systems.8283
EPIC also scores high in terms of the Smart-Agile aspects of provision for the development of targeted automatic algorithms to inform and support cost-effective medical and organizational decisions while taking into account possible risks.28301044 Smart-agile systems consider responsive knowledge management key to high-quality, efficient healthcare, and they can alert and trigger marshalling of a substantial amount of comprehensive data to do so.10 Put differently, EPIC has shown the potential to support Smart-Agile healthcare through better information that increases quality with earlier, more appropriate, and less expensive treatments.1084 Decision-makers can be enabled to make efficient and effective use of vastly increased amounts of data in modern information-driven healthcare industries. The capacity for more data in turn means more performance measures can be gauged. 1 This means a higher probability that healthcare organizations can quickly delivery the right products at the right time, with the right quality, and at the right price—the essence of Smart-Agile.1858687 Furthermore, adoption of Smart-Agile processes has been shown to direct service delivery toward a customer-oriented paradigm, which in turn supports agile decision-making in organizations, if not agility itself. 88
Technological Somnambulism
Regarding technological constraints, EPIC fairs less well according to the Smart-Agile criterion of “quality.”25 Smart-Agile IT systems permit a degree of non-standardization in that customers/patients/stakeholders and their needs are non-standard with differing “preferences, personal characteristics, and conditions.”1041 Then there are healthcare providers with differing backgrounds, professional roles, skills, training, and experience that must be accounted for.1039 Therefore, to be Smart-Agile, healthcare IT systems must have both novel and standardize inputs, though EPIC tends to favor standardization.
Hard-stop-enabled standardized data entry comes with a downside, namely, risk of reflexive and non-reflective technology-driven hypnosis and even sleepwalking.70717290 EPIC suffers from issues surrounding all EHRs with meaningful use capabilities. Specifically, front-end data collection is shepherded, entailing overreliance on pre-determined (i.e., “canned”) forms and templates for information collection—as opposed to producing truly meaningful data.29 This may be further complicated by polished and slick-veneered electronic systems. This can be remedied by a dedicated team of medical experts, software designers and vendors updating and customizing forms and templates to capture relevant medical information throughout the medical care cycle—but those come at a steep price299151 In this regard, a similar drawback with EPIC is that it does not permit entering more specific or different information28, except through the incorporation of expensive add-ons that detract from its overall efficiency.27829293
In terms of EHR product development, because the EHR development cycle is regulated, and thus lengthy, it also is expensive—anathema to Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems aspect 41055749640586478798393949597. Yet EPIC offers modifiable off-the-shelf packages that that keep costs relatively low and have the capability for continuous innovation and improvement in general. 27 Nevertheless, those innovations do involve costly teams of experts and designers, and so they score low in terms of Smart-Agility healthcare IT systems10411 It is probably no better or worse in this area than other meaningful-use EHRs.
Time Commitments and Productivity
This is another area where EPIC does not fare well according to Smart-Agile IT healthcare systems aspects; specifically, additional expense and work burden on end-users.1041 Several issues are unescapable with all meaningful-use EHRs that turn clinicians into data entry clerks. One is the additional time commitment of entering data loaded onto the already time-intensive commitments of clinical practice.50568283899097 also see 274781 EPIC seems to be no different. Added documentation in EPIC also adds burden on healthcare providers.8398 However, the resulting seamless data analysis may be well worth the effort from providers’ perspectives. Nevertheless, there is that substantial “after hours’ time tax” to enter information.56839899100101102
Two, what really makes EPIC truly desirable for outcomes measurement, program evaluation, and research are its hard stops. 29657696100101103104 However, they also pose a severe detraction or Achilles’ heel in that they disrupt smooth workflow and also result in end-use dissatisfaction.706847 Nevertheless, it has been noted that medical providers’ productivity work volume, charges, and work relative to volume units actually increases with EPIC; the caveat is that it takes several months of a painful learning curve to realize increased productivity. 8110563808399100101102106
Real-time Data Warehousing and (Patient-centered) Efficient Production of Outcome Measures
Competitive agility, in accordance with Smart-Agility healthcare IT systems, is predicated on IT systems that are positioned “to produce, capture, store, process, and communicate.”104125** Therefore, EPIC excels on this particularly critical Smart-Agility IT healthcare systems metric.
EPIC excels when it comes to drawing on the vast warehouse of data it stores and generating reasonably accurate (and extremely timely) outcome measures, which is eponymously the essence of “meaningful use.” 71729027294649545556616267747880107108109 EPIC has been shown to substantially decrease multi-center decision support systems and time-to-decision, and physician’s use of data to dramatically improve accurate diagnosis and treatment. 497172 It has been shown that physicians using EPIC for data output substantially and geometrically improves accurate diagnosis; however, some of this was not possible without add-on programs that helped analyze the raw data that the back-end of EPIC produced.81892747719010210849 There is substantial support for EPIC being the ideal front-end-to-back-end interface between required documentation and clinical research.3516171824779107108110.
Another feature of IT systems that enable agility is that they provide secure, high-quality data exchange essential to efficient health care1041, which the literature clearly suggest EPIC provides. In this regard, EPIC’s capability in accordance with this Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems is remarkable; EPIC “overcomes the healthcare barriers involved with data-driven and analytical decision including but not limited to: incomplete personal healthcare data, unconnected or silo’ed data, large amounts of unstructured data, and even paper-based records.”1041 The literature suggests EPIC has a track record—per Smart-Agile IT systems criterion— of ‘high-quality, secure, compliance-driven, intra-operability enabled by healthcare experience and geared toward efficient change and process management.’1041 EPIC enhances big-data enabling of business intelligence (BI) as well as knowledge-management for the collection, analysis, and dissemination of substantial amounts of structured and unstructured data for quick actionable and accurate decisions.106 And “big data” promises yet-untapped potential of insights into miracle cures, disease etiology, waste prevention, and every imaginable realm of healthcare to include informing Smart-Agile decisions.22*
Enhanced Patient Safety
Critical to Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems is the “provision of informed seamless patient-centric for actionable healthcare delivery paramount of which is the maintenance of patient safety.”10432588 EPIC’s ability to quickly and accurately derive outcome measures is critical in terms of efficient and timely identification of potentially deadly patient hazards and targeting those patients for intervention.4959617475819710010610710811111211311411511657 EPIC is a powerful tool to monitor adherence to prescribing best practices, but only with rather expensive add-ons with which to conduct analyses and a lot of hard stops interfering with workflows.298189117757779
EPIC facilitates the coordination of patient healthcare to promote safety and long-term wellness, while remaining cost-effective through comparable patient notes.103940 And Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems lend themselves to the aspect of “development of tools to better real-time monitor processes and outcomes to include safety, and in particular for the healthcare industry, patient safety.”10 EPIC’s ability to standardize and connect resources “accelerates patient recoveries, enhances evidence-based practices and less-expensive preventive medicine—and thus, provide Smart-Agile improved care.”1022
Patient Tracking and Follow-up
A critical cornerstone of Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems concept is systems integration, i.e., inter-operability and inter-connectivity that permits ease of follow-up in the interest of continuity of care and also safety. 1041 also see 25 EPIC’s ability to accurately derive and report information in almost real time to identify patient safety risks also lends itself to excellent patient tracking, monitoring, and follow-up.28294661739495107117 EPIC is an excellent system for electronically tracking patients and their procedures, and documenting complications, risks, and sources of unplanned outcomes.46 EPIC also provides an excellent data recording system for conducting inexpensive, continuous four-year longitudinal patient surveys; it also permits easy aggregation by type and level of complications, though this requires expensive add-on algorithms.11769 In this regard, EPIC also scores high on another Smart-Agile healthcare IT system criterion, service provision, including personalized medicine and the connectivity features to support that104125.
End-user Satisfaction
According to Smart-Agile IT healthcare systems, end-users’ satisfaction is critical because it relates to a large degree to stakeholder buy-in (as end-users are one group of stakeholders).1041 Specifically, users’ satisfaction with their healthcare IT system is important because “healthcare organizations represent powerful stakeholders whose concern is high-quality healthcare provision and delivery, not learning or wrestling with IT.”1041
End-user satisfaction is one area where EPIC scores are mediocre or even low or failing; the range of physician average satisfaction rates are between 50 – 75% depending on the particular EPIC feature. 32710210410610911847 One key feature that resulted in the most end-user dissatisfaction was EPIC’s “Reminder(s)”; they operate much like its hard stops in that they must be addressed before proceeding with workflow.29477089106 This clearly detracts from EPIC’s usefulness in terms of preventive medicine and patient safety. Overburdening and overwhelming medical treatment providers with best practices advisories in large numbers generate scores of complaints.47106 Marked improvement on end-user satisfaction was noted when limits were placed on Reminders.7089 Nevertheless, Reminders significantly improve compliance among providers in terms of orders and rates of adherence to directive and documentation.707172 This may be why EPIC works better than other EHRs that use passive collection in terms of outcomes. But extreme dissatisfaction has been noted with it and results in less-than-optimal use of some key EPIC functions. One reason the end-users feel this way is that data entry for them is inefficient and too time-consuming.3294755637076777989106110 Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems must be efficient to warrant their cost, and EPIC probably needs improvement regarding this end-user feature. Put differently, it needs to clearly demonstrate value-added in terms of time-consuming data entry.1044
Patient Involvement
A critical aspect insinuated throughout Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems is patient involvement in their healthcare via IT systems—an area where EPIC has shown a track record and vast potential.1039 Specifically, Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems must involve patients as primary end-users (a.k.a., stakeholders).1039 The promotion of patient-centric wellness involves the unified amalgamation of different IT delivery systems.
EPIC’s connectivity and ability to electronically transmit real-time medical chart information securely over the Internet has vast potential regarding proactive integration of patients into the management of their own healthcare273447, even older non-tech-savvy patients.93 This can enable and empower patients to easily and smoothly transfer or upload images and documents from outside sources and physicians to shift their patient management to more virtual vs. less face-to-face encounters.47
According to Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems aspects, EPIC’s aim to consolidate processes and simplify, demystify, and automate business practices—while involving patients in their healthcare—creates and synchs a collaboration between patients as valued partners with providers.1041 As such, EPIC has the potential to involve both patients and providers as co-producers in Smart-Agile medical treatment, and this will alter the fundamental pattern of those interactions.
Of course, all this requires a common (i.e., standardized) language that EPIC facilitates. And according to Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems rationale, process orientation has been shown overall to support cost reductions, improve product quality and customer satisfaction, and decrease the production cycle time.104188
Training
The literature on Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems appears to understate ongoing training that must necessarily accompany dynamic IT systems. Thus it is considered non-critical25 Nevertheless, there has been identification in the EPIC literature of the essential need for ongoing training in terms of transitioning and exploiting EPIC’s potential to its fullest475961637710410510912180 Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems literature tends to view training as an additional expense and encumbrance to be avoided, as opposed to an investment in the future in terms of responsiveness and efficiency.11912079 Perhaps this is an area that the Smart-Agile IT systems researchers and proponents should reconsider as vital and revisit.
Potential Use in Medical Education
The Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems proponents recognize that Smart-Agile systems represent a platform from which to deliver healthcare training to healthcare professionals; this is considered a critical aspect.104144252639 EPIC also has potential as a tool for the delivery of medical training and education. 27296083909598105106121 However, EPIC’s standardized templates impose limits on documenting and dictation and thus detract from its potential for medical education in terms of extemporaneity.90272998. Hence, EPIC appears to adhere to the Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems criterion of encouraging the involvement of healthcare providers—the “powerful” stakeholders in healthcare organizations—in the IT systems as generators of high-quality data and recipients of up-to-date healthcare training with the aim of ultimately improving patient care through informed analytic decision of best practices. 104439
Report Card on EPIC in Terms of Smart-Agile Healthcare IT Systems
The findings in the literature review in this article on EPIC’ meaningful use features graded in terms of Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems aspects are summarized in the “Report Card” that is depicted in Table 1. Scoring of themes was simple nominal presence or absence in terms of synthesized summary statements of meaningful use featuress with referenced citations in the literature. Nominal presence / absence avoids subjectivity that would be encountered with Ordinal – Ratio numeric scoring. Criticality was determined according to the necessity / criticalness in terms of Smart-Agile aspects. Note: EPIC’s meaningful use features potential to meet or not meet Smart-Agility aspects were also counted as presence and absence respectively—not a subjective matter of degree.
EPIC Report Card
Rating
EPIC Meaningful Use Features
Critical / Non-Critical
+
Standardized Data Collection
C
-
Technological Somnambulism
NC
+
Real-time Data Warehousing and (Patient-centered) Efficient Production of Outcome Measures
C
-
Time Commitment and Productivity
NC
+
Enhanced Patient Safety
C
+
Patient Tracking / Follow-up and Continuity of Care
C
-
End-user Satisfaction
C
+
Patient Involvement
C
(+)
(IT) Training
NC
+
Potential Use for Medical Education
C
(Table 1) depicts that, when EPIC is graded in terms of Smart-Agile healthcare IT aspects, EPIC’s meaningful-use components appear mediocre at best (7 out of 11), and fail at worst (6 out of 11). However, EPIC succeeds and excels on Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems aspects that are the most central, critical and valuable (7 out of 8) in terms of informing healthcare organizations’ decisions and their patients’ care, specifically: Standardized Data Collection / Connectivity, Real-Time Data Warehousing/Outcome Measures, Enhanced Patient Safety, Patient Tracking and Follow-up (Continuity of Care), Patient Involvement, and Potential Use in Medical Education. Also, this work highlighted an area that Smart-Agile healthcare systems should consider, namely, IT education.
Conclusion
This work reported a comprehensive best-practices literature review derived from peer-reviewed articles on “meaningful use” features of EPIC’s EHR system related to their potential to fulfill the Smart-Agile healthcare IT systems concept—that is, their ability to inform and enable agile healthcare organization decisions and patient care. As such, this work derived a presence-absence report card on EPIC’s ability to afford smart use and enhance Smart-Agility—the report card was mixed.
This comparative review revealed that EPIC provides a rigorous front-end-to-back-end system for the rapid collection and inter-connected management of medical records information that lends itself to efficient reporting and informing agile management decisions. Thus, it truly has the ability to accurately inform Smart-Agile organizational advancement, in particular for patient medical treatment and healthcare organizations in general.
Nevertheless, that accuracy and rigor is achieved at a (hidden) cost, specifically, increased workloads on medical practitioners and various cross-team over-commitments that result in inefficiency, which in turn detracts from agility and is not smart use. The question in terms of agility is: At what point does the price exceed the benefit of agility sought, so that it is no longer a smart use investment?
Researcher experience clearly suggests that EPIC can provide substantial raw data that can be further refined with add-on analytic tools, auto-algorithms, or hands-on user analyses. EPIC’s exacting and comprehensive (auto) interconnected data collection lends itself to nearly real-time provision of information to powerfully improve the accurate responsiveness and agility of healthcare organizations and medical treatment decisions.28
Thus, EPIC has the unparalleled ability to augment agility in terms of enhancing patient safety and tweak treatment adjustments accordingly—through not only comprehensive inter-connected data but also limited and worthwhile reminders and hard-stops. Conversely, increased and unwarranted data entry and hard stop reminders are not smart use; they detract from agility in that this can cause extreme dissatisfaction in end-users as well as frustration, aggravation, and burn-out in busy medical practitioners.
Furthermore, used indiscriminately, EPICs standardization is not Smart-Agile nor contributes to agile practice and decisions. This is the flipside and danger of meaningful use systems, namely, Technological Somnambulism. Specifically, the computer is doing the leading and driving. Cognizant organizational decision makers and practitioners switch to auto-pilot and are just blindly along for the ride. Without analytically sharp decision-makers at all levels using the high-quality information EPIC culls to inform Smart-Agile practices, the computer becomes an end in itself rather than a means or tool to an agile end. EPIC does favor consistency and relationships where, if unguided by discerning and reflective medical insight, EPIC’s medical information could easily become vacuous and powerless, especially in terms of Smart Agility.
Nevertheless, EPIC’s most profound and yet-to-be-tapped benefit to users is as an IT teaching tool. Note, this is an feature overlooked in terms of smart and agile use, and should be included in any future discourses. EPIC has also shown great promise in terms of synergizing patient connectivity and involvement in their own healthcare—which is an aspect of smart use and agility.
The report card on EPIC is mixed. Yet it should be noted that Smart-Agility is an ideal. And all IT systems are imperfect at best. Nevertheless, as EPIC increasingly governs large swathes of EHR market shares and makes inroads into other IT markets that involve records, the challenge will be whether users can overcome its inflexibility and accommodate more aspects of Smart-Agile use. 48 EPIC, like all meaningful use IT healthcare systems, has federally mandated features. Thus, another important question is how well EPIC’s competitors do in terms of smart use and agility and whether the ideal of the Smart-Agility concept is even a fair test for software never originally designed with this in mind. These considerations were not the province of this study but will be matters for future investigations.
*Note: A hard stop is a prompt that will not allow an operation to proceed without entering particular data in a standard and correct format.
**Note: This is variously referred to in the Smart-Agile literature as “portfolio management,” that is, Smart-Agile decisions based on valid and sufficient information derived from interoperability, stability, compressive-ness, and rigor, and continuously aimed at project operations in competitive and turbulent situations to seize opportunities and advance healthcare organization goals. 87
DeclarationsEthical Approval and Consent to Participate
Non-applicable, this was a review of open-source documents and analyses of anonymous publically available data.
Consent for Publication
Yes.
Availability of Data and Materials
The “datasets” used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable formal request.
Funding
Non-applicable, this research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Authors’ Contribution
Non-applicable, there is one sole Author.
Corresponding author
Reprints and correspondence should be addressed to the author at ralph.johnson@txsg.state.tx.us, or rjjohnson@mdanderson.org, UT-MDACC, Unit 429, 1515 Holcombe, Houston, Texas, 77030-400, U.S.A. (713-745-2207; 832-372-3511)
The Author wishes to gratefully acknowledge in-kind support of the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. in the preparation of this manuscript. Also, the author thanks Ms. Deborah Davis for her encouragement in pursuing the subject matter and proof of concept and Ms. Aileen “Acey” Cho freelance-copy editor for proofing and copyediting drafts. The opinions expressed are solely those of the Author.
WuCBarnesDA dynamic feedback model for partner selection in agile supply chains20123217910310.1108/01443571211195745HåkanssonHSnehotaINo business Is an Island: The Network Concept of business strategy198922187200LinC RChiuHChuP YAgility index in the supply chain20061002285299ChristopherMLeeHMitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence.Int34388396ChristopherMPeckHBuilding the resilient supply chain.Int Log Man20041511310.1108/09574090410700275ChristopherMTowillDSupply Chain Migration From Lean and Functional to Agile and Customised.Sup Chain20005206213KleindorferP RWassenhouseLNVanManaging the risk in the global supply chain in Gantignon H and Kimberly JR (eds),The INSEAD-Wharton Alliance on Globalization: Strategies for Building Successful Global Business,Cambridge2004288331University PressLondonPraterEBiehlMSmithM2001International Supply Chain Agility—Tradeoffs between Flexibility and Uncertainty.Int J Ops & Prod Man.:21130International Supply Chain Agility—Tradeoffs between Flexibility and UncertaintyBanihashemiS AAhSaraniAssessment of organizational agility in cement industry20126278055806410.5897/AJBM11.2124DemirkanHSmart healthcare systems framework: More service oriented, instrumented2013interconnected and intelligent,”IEEE IT Professional3845TolfSNystromM ETishelmanCBrommelsMAgile, a guiding principle for health care improvement?Int J Health Care Qual Assur:20152854689310.1108/IJHCQA-04-2014-004426020429SheffiYDemand, variability, and supply chain flexibilityin Prockl G (ed.) Contributions in Logistics, University of NurnbergNurnbergSwarffordP MGhoshSMurthyNA framework for assessing value chain agility200626211840JainVBenyoucefLDeshmukhA balanced approach to building agile supply chains,Int20084623664977LiXChuangCGoldsbyT JHolsappleC WA unified model of supply chain partnering under limited evaluation resources.Int200820667591CharlesALaurasMLVan WassenA model to define and assess the agility of supply chains: Building on humanitarian experience.Int J PhysDistand Log Man2010408101108EmeraldSlackNThe flexibility of manufacturing systems,Int200525121190200YusufY YSarhadiMGunasekaranAAgile manufacturing: the drivers, concepts and attributes,Int J Prod Econ199913343SharifiHZhangZA methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction,Int J Prod Econ:199962722GiachettiR EMartinezL DSaenzO AChenC SAnalysis of the structural measures of flexibility and agility using a measurement theoretical framework,Int20038614762SorkinAWhen unequals try to merge as equals.New York Times2007FebruaryNambiarRSethiABharwajRVargheseRA look at challenges and opportunities of Big Data Analytics2013in healthcare.IEEE International Conference on Big Data:OkongwuULaurasMHumezVDupontLA decision support system for optimizing order production fulfillment.Production Planning and Control:2012LuoXRosenbergDBarnesP SSupplier selection in agile supply chains: An information processing model and an illustration200915424962LinkevicsGSukovskis201518212610.1515/acss-2015-0015.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297726066_Evaluation_of_the_Agility_Level_of_the_OrganizationPipeT BBuchdaV LLaunderSHudakBBuilding personal and professional resources of resilience and agility in the healthcare workplace.Stress Health2012Feb;28(1): 11-22. doi: 10.1002/smi.1396. Epub13222591541010.1002/smi.139622259154MakamA NLanhamH JBatchelorKSamalLUse and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: A survey of primary care providers.BMC Med Inform Decision Making:20131310118610.1186/1472-6947-13-8624070335KatzanISpeckMDoplerCUrchekJThe Knowledge Program: An innovative, comprehensive, electronic capture system and warehouse.AMIA2011AnnSympProc. 683-92. Epub2219512422195124CarberryKLandmanZXieMFeeleyTIncorporating longitudinal pediatric-centered outcome measurement into the clinical workflow using a commercial electronic health record: A step toward increasing value for the patient.J Am Med Inform Ass:201610109310.1093/jamia/ocv12526377989PorterM ETeisbergERedefining Health Care. Boston,MA:Harvard BusinessPublishing20062020060502TierneyW MImproving clinical decisions and outcomes with information: A review.Int J Med Inform2001621910.1016/s1386-5056(01)00127-7https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1386505601001277?via%3Dihub11340002BlumenthalDTavennerMThe meaningful use regulation for electronic health records.NEnglJ201036350150410.1056/NEJMp100611420647183CfMMServicesEHR Incentive Program [online]. Available athttp://www.cms.gov/ehrincentiveprogramsGerberD ELacettiA LBeibeiCJingshengYPredictors and intensity of online access to electronic medical records among patients with cancer.JOncPract:2014PMID: 25006222 PMCID: PMC4161732 DOI:25006222FerrisNMeaningful Use” of electronic health records.Health2010Epic Electronic Health Record [Computer software]Madison, WI: Epic; Madison, WIRothMIn EMR market share wars, Epic and Cerner triumph yet again. Hlth Ldrs2019JohnsonR JA Comprehensive Review of an Electronic Health Record System Soon to Assume Market Ascendancy: EPIC®.J Healthcare Comm104172DOI:10.4172/2472-1654.100036.https://healthcare-communications.imedpub.com/a-comprehensive-review-of-an-electronic-health-record-system-soon-to-assume-market-ascendancy-epic.php?aid=17222,1:IzzaSImacheRVincentLLounisY2013An Approach for the Evaluation of the Agility in the Context of Enterprise Interoperability in Mertins K, Ruggaber R, Popplewell K, and Xu X(eds.)EnterpriseInteroperabilityIII:NewChallenges and IndustrialApproaches:New York,NY;Springer Publications,doi:10100710.1007/978-1-84800-221-0StraussAJCorbin.Basics of Qualitative Research – Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4thed., London, Sage Publications: 2014. ISBN-13: 9781412997461 9781483315683 ISBN-10:1412997461GlaserB Gand Strauss AL.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction;1967New BrunswickRamalhoRAdamsPHuggardPHoareKLiterature review and constructivist grounded theory methodology.Forum Qual Soc Res2015163LiberatiAAltmanDTetzlaffJMulrowCThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.BMJ2009LiberatiAAltmanD GTetzlaffJMulrowCThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.J Clin Epidemiol2009Oct;62(10): e1-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. Epub2319631507089510.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.00619631507https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0895-4356(09)00180-2MoherDShamseerLClarkeMGhersiDPreferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P)2015410118610.1186/2046-4053-4-125554246DeBoerE MPragerJ DKerbyG SStillwellP CMeasuring pediatric bronchoscopy outcomes using Electronic Medical Record.Ann AmThoracSoc:20162710151310.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-576OC26816220BornsteinSAn integrated EHR at Northern California Kaiser-Permanente.App Clin Inform:2012333182510.4338/ACI-2012-03-RA-0006KoppelRLehmannC UImplications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems.Am Med Inform Assoc:20152224657110.1136/amiajnl-2014-00302325342181GrigoryanLZaroobRWangHTrautnerB WLow concordance with guidelines for treatment of acute cystitis in primary care.Open Forum Infect Dis20152410109310.1093/ofid/ofv159LindholmCAdsitRBainPReberP MA demonstration project for using the electronic health record to identify and treat tobacco users.WMJ:2010109633540PMCID:BellonJ EStevansJ MCohenS MJamesAE 3rdComparing advanced practice providers and physicians as providers of e-visits.TelemedJ E Health:2015doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0248. Epub211210192610.1089/tmj.2014.024826161623BeckJ DDeeganJ HRiehlJ TKlenaJ CIncidence of scapholunate ligament dissociation in patients with aspiration-confirmed gout.J Hand Surg Am:201010.1016/j.jhsa.2010.08.009. Epub351219384210.1016/j.jhsa.2010.08.009StirlingATubbTReiffE SGrotegutC AIdentified themes of interactive visualizations overlayed onto EHR data: an example of improving birth center operating room efficiency.J Am Med Inform Assoc.2020 Mar pii:
ocaa016. doi:
ocaa016PeticolasKKhairatSSeashoreCLawJPhysician-Led EHR Customization Tracking Assessments for Pediatric Patients with Turner Syndrome.Stud HealthTechnol Inform201926227610.3233/SHTI19007231349321http://ebooks.iospress.nl/publication/51734LewinskiA ADrakeCShawR JJacksonG LBridging the integration gap between patient-generated blood glucose data and electronic health records.Stud Health Technol Inform2019427627910.3233/SHTI19007231349321https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article/26/7/667/5476183FixenD RLinneburS AParnesB LVejarM VDevelopment and economic evaluation of a pharmacist-provided chronic care management service in an ambulatory care geriatrics clinic.Am J Health Syst Pharm2018752218051811Epub
PMID: 30104259.https://academic.oup.com/ajhp/article-abstract/75/22/1805/5220686?redirectedFrom=fulltext
10.2146/ajhp17072330104259.https://academic.oup.com/ajhp/article-abstract/75/22/1805/5220686?redirectedFrom=fulltextSanelli-RussoSFolkersK MSakolskyWFinsJ JMeaningful Use of Electronic Health Records for Quality Assessment and Review of Clinical Ethics Consultation.J Clin Ethics2018291526129565797MansourRMasterSAutomating Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Quality Measure NHL78a.JCO Clin Cancer Inform2017Nov;1: 1-6. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00038. PMID:3065738910.1200/CCI.17.0003830657389DusekJ AGriffinK HFinchM DRivardR L2018Cost Savings from Reducing Pain Through the Delivery of Integrative Medicine Program to Hospitalized Patients.J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Jun;24(6): 557-563. doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.0203. Epub232947409510.1089/acm.2017.020329474095FedermanASarzynskiEBrachCFrancavigliaPChallenges optimizing the after visit summary.Int J Med Inform2018Dec;120: 14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.009. Epub
PMID: 30409339 PMCID:
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.00930409339CarterZ AGoldmanSAndersonKLiXCreation of an Internal Teledermatology Store-and-Forward System in an Existing Electronic Health Record: A Pilot Study in a Safety-Net Public Health and Hospital System.JAMA Dermatol2017153764465010.1001/jamadermatol.2017.020428423156MilinovichAKattanM WExtracting and utilizing electronic health data from Epic for research.AnnTranslMed201810.21037/atm.2018.01.13 PMCID: PMC5879514 PMID:6329610734587951410.21037/atm.2018.01.1329610734https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5879514/pdf/atm-06-03-42.pdfHelmersRDoebbelingB NKaufmanDGrandoAMayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Reco Implementation Evaluation.Mayo Clin ProcInnovQual Outcomes20193331932610.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.06.004BernsteinS LRosnerJDeWittMTetraultJDesign and implementation of decision support for tobacco dependence treatment in an inpatient electronic medical record: a randomized trial.TranslBehavMed20177218519510.1007/s13142-017-0470-828194729McDowellJWuAEhrenfeldJ MUrmanR DEffect of the Implementation of a New Electronic Health Record2017System on Surgical Case Turnover Time.J Med Syst. 2017 Mar;41(3): 422710100710.1007/s10916-017-0690-y28130725.https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0690-y
https://www.epic.com/CareEverywhere/
SchleeleinJVincentA MJawadA FPruittE YPediatric perioperative adverse events requiring rapid response: a retrospective case-control study.PaediatrAnaesth2016Jul;26(7): 734-41. doi: 10.1111/pan.12922. Epub10.1111/pan.12922OnuhaO GHatchM BMianoT AFleisherL AThe incidence of un-indicated preoperative testing in a tertiary academic ambulatory center: a retrospective cohort study.PerioperMed (Lond)20151510118610.1186/s13741-015-0023-y26677410KrasnowskiM DWilfordJ DHowardWDaneS KImplementation of Epic Beaker Clinical Pathology at an academic medical center.JPatholInform20165104103
7: 7. Published online
10.4103/2153-3539.175798LangsjoenJGoodellCCastroEThomasJImproving compliance with cervical cancer screening guidelines.Proc (BaylUniv Med Cent)2015284450326424938UnniSYaoYMilneNGunningKAn evaluation of clinical risk factors for estimating fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis using an electronic medical record database.OsteoporosInt20152625817HayekSNievaRCorriganFZhouAEnd-of-life care planning: improving documentation of advance directives in the outpatient clinic using electronic medical records.JPalliatMed2014Dec;17(12): 1348-52. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0684. PMID:249884971010.1089/jpm.2013.068424988497BloomfieldRA JrPolo-WoodFMandelJ CMandlK DOpening the Duke electronic health record to apps: Implementing2016SMART on FHIR.Int J Med Inform. 2017 Mar;99: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.005. Epub28118917138650561630273810.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.00528118917https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1386505616302738?via%3DihubMoreno-IribasCSayon-OreaCDelfradeJArdanazEValidity of type 2 diabetes diagnosis in a population-based electronic health record database.BMC Med InformDecisMak201717110118610.1186/s12911-017-0439-z28390396BushR AConnellyC DPérezABarlowHExtracting autism spectrum disorder data from the electronic health record.Appl Clin Inform20178373174110.4338/ACI-2017-02-RA-002928925416WangJ KOuyangDHomJChiJCharacterizing electronic health record usage patterns of inpatient medicine residents using event log data.PLoSOne20193072620810.1371/journal.pone.020537930726208BarclayCViswanathanMRatnerSTompkinsJImplementing Evidence-Based Screening and Counseling for Unhealthy Alcohol Use with Epic-Based Electronic Health Record Tools.J Comm J Qual PatientSaf201945856657410.1016/j.jcjq.2019.05.00931378277GoriDBanerjeeIChungB IFerrariMExtracting Patient-Centered Outcomes from Clinical Notes in Electronic Health Records: Assessment of Urinary Incontinence After Radical ProstatectomyDelFiol GKohlmannWBradshawR LWeirC RStandards-Based Clinical Decision Support Platform to Manage Patients Who Meet Guideline-Based Criteria for Genetic Evaluation of Familial Cancer.JCO Clin Cancer Inform2020Jan;4: 1-9. doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00120. PMID:3195147410.1200/CCI.19.0012031951474BainP ACollaboration saves time.WMJ:200810783801
PMID: 19331008https://www.wismed.org/wisconsin
19331008https://www.wismed.org/wisconsinHeidemannLLawJFontanaR JA text searching tool to identify patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver Injury.Dig Dis Sci201762361562510.1007/s10620-015-3970-826597192SweetKGordonE SSturmA CSchmidlenTDesign and implementation of a randomized controlled trial of genomic counseling for patients with chronic disease.J Pers Med20144111910.3390/jpm401000126597192CoxM LFarjatA ERisoliT JPeskoeSDocumenting or Operating: Where Is Time Spentin General Surgery Residency?J Surg Educ.2018 Nov;75(6):e97-e10610101610.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.010FlatowV HIbragimovaNDivinoC MEshakD SQuality outcomes in the surgical intensive care unit after electronic health record implementation.Appl Clin Inform:2015646111826767058HuangX GWongY SWangJ GA two-stage manufacturing partner selection framework for virtual enterprise.Int1615364BaselKKnottDSvan KuikenThe big-data revolution in US healthcare: Accelerating value and innovation:201313KockAGemundsenH GAntecedents to decision-making quality and agility in innovation portfolio management.J ProdInnovMan201633667068610111/jpim.12336ClevenAMettlerTRohnerPWinterRHealthcare quality innovation and performance through process orientation: Evidence from general hospitals in Switzerland.Tech Forecast2016113386395DOI:ChiJKuglerJChuI MLoftusP DMedical students and the electronic health record: 'an epic use of time'.Am2014Sep;127(9): 891-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.027. Epub10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.027HammoudM MMargoKChristnerJ GFisherJFischerS HOpportunities and challenges in integrating electronic health records into undergraduate medical education: a national survey of clerkship directors.Teach Learn Med2432192410.1080/10401334.2012.692267KlehrJHafnerJSpelzL MSteenSImplementation of standardized nomenclature in the electronic medical record.Int JNursTerminolClassif:20092041698010.1111/j.1744-618X.2009.01132.x19883454CheriffA DKapurA GQiuMColeC LPhysician productivity and the ambulatory EHR in a large academic multi-specialty physician group.Int J Med Inform201079749250010.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.04.00620478738SeltzerA Ramirez-ZohfeldXiongLMorseLLindquistL AUse of Electronic Health Records by Older Adults, 85 and Older, and Their Caregivers.J AmGeriatrSoc2020CChokshiSMannDWearable Health Technology and Electronic Health Record Integration: Scoping Review and Future Directions.JMIRMhealthUhealth20197910219610.2196/1286131512582KimG EAfanasievO KO'DellCSharpCImplementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care store-and-forward teledermatology consultation workflow built within an existing electronic health record system.JTelemedTelecare201810.1177/1357633X18799805CalvittiAHochheiserHAshfaqSBellKPhysician activity during outpatient visits and subjective workload.J Biomed Inform2017May;69: 135-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.03.011. Epub10.1016/j.jbi.2017.03.011RatwaniR MSavageEWillAArnoldRA usability and safety analysis of electronic health records: a multi-center study.J Am Med Inform Assoc20182591197120110.1093/jamia/ocy088Buery-JoynerS DDalrympleJ LAbbottJ FCraigL BOvercoming Electronic Medical Record Challenges on the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship.ObstetGynecol: 2015 Sep;126(3):5538KhairatSColemanCOttmarPBiceTPhysicians' gender and their use of electronic health records: findings from a mixed-methods usability study.J Am Med Inform Assoc2019261215051514WhalenKLynchEMoawadIJohnTaletaTransition to a new electronic health record and pediatric medication safety: lessons learned in pediatrics within a large academic health system.J Am Med Inform Assoc2018257848854RizviR FMarquardJ LSeywerdM AAdamT JUsability Evaluation of an EHR's Clinical Notes Interface from the Perspective of Attending and Resident Physicians: An Exploratory Study.Stud Health Technol Inform20171128113229688461KamilR JGiddingsNHofferMYingY MElectronic Health Record Use Among American Neurotology Society Members.OtolNeurotol2018399FriendT HJenningsS JLevineW CCommunication Patterns in the Perioperative Environment During Epic Electronic Health Record System Implementation.J Med Syst2017Feb;41(2): 2210100710.1007/s10916-016-0674-3ArndtB GBeasleyJ WWatkinsonM DTemteJ LTethered to the EHR: Primary Care Physician Workload Assessment Using EHR Event Log Data and Time-Motion ObservationsAnn Fam Med2017;13701541942610.1370/afm.2121PereiraA GKimMSeywerdMNesbittBon behalf of the Minnesota Epic101 Collaborative. Collaborating for Competency-A Model for Single Electronic Health Record Onboarding for Medical Students Rotating among Separate Health Systems.Appl Clin Inform20189119920410.1055/s-0038-1635096SharplessB RdelRosario FMolle-RiosZHilmasEUse of Electronic Health Record Tools to Facilitate and Audit Infliximab Prescribing.JPediatrPharmacolTher20182311825Ter-MinassianMLanzkronSDerusABrownEQuality Metrics and Health Care Utilization for Adult Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.J Natl Med Assoc2019Feb;111(1): 54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2018.05.003. Epub3012948410.1016/j.jnma.2018.05.00330129484PalestineA GMerrillP TSaleemS MJabsD AThorneJ E2018Assessing the Precision of ICD-10 Codes for Uveitis in 2 Electronic Health Record Systems.JAMAOphthalmol1361011861190HolmgrenA JAdler-MilsteinJMcCulloughJAre all certified EHRs created equal? Assessing the relationship between EHR vendor and hospital meaningful use performance.J Am Med Inform Assoc201825665466010.1093/jamia/ocx135BolandM VHwangT SLimM CPetersonJ LMedicare Incentive Payments to United States Ophthalmologists for Use of Electronic Health Records: 2011-2016.Ophth:20191267928934GoldbergH SPaternoM DGrundmeierR WRochaB HUse of a remote clinical decision support service for a multicenter trial to implement prediction rules for children with minor blunt head trauma.Int J Med Inform2016Mar;87:1011010.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.002KullarRGoffD ASchulzL TFoxB CThe "epic" challenge of optimizing antimicrobial stewardship: the role of electronic medical records and technology.Clin Infect Dis:201357710051310.1093/cid/cit318SteidlMZimmernPData for free--can an electronic medical record provide outcome data for incontinence/prolapse repair procedures?J Urol201310101610.1016/j.juro.2012.08.186ChimaC SFarmer-DziakNCardwellPSnowSUse of technology to track program outcomes in a diabetes self-management program.J Am Diet Assoc:20051051219338AdelsonK BQiuY CEvangelistaMSpencer-CisekPImplementation of electronic chemotherapy ordering: an opportunity to improve evidence-based oncology care.J OncolPract2014Mar;10(2):e113-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001184. PMID:2437130110.1200/JOP.2013.00118424371301SonsteinLClarkCSeidenstickerSZengLImproving adherence for management of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Am201412711109710410.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.03324927911BrennB RChoudhryD KSacksKOutpatient outcomes and satisfaction in pediatric population: data from the postoperative phone call.PaediatrAnaesth20162621586310.1111/pan.12817BushR AKuelbsCRyuJJiangW2017Structured Data Entry in the Electronic Medical Record: Perspectives of Pediatric Specialty Physicians and Surgeons.J Med Syst. 2017 May;41(5): 7510100710.1007/s10916-017-0716-528324321KhoshsimaGA strategic model for measuring agility with fuzzy logic2008Advances in Computation and Intelligence.Lecture Notes in Computer Science537025826810.1007/978-3-540-92137-0_29VinodhSSakthivelA RAgility evaluation using the IF-THEN approach.Int15710071090.1080/00207543.2010.524260ZavodnickJKouvatsosT2019Electronic Health Record Skills Workshop for Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL:.15101576610.15766/mep_2374-8265.10849